Posted on 08/19/2006 1:44:20 PM PDT by Huntress
Yes John Mark Karr is wack and yes he is delusional. I’m trying not to rush to judgment here or jumping to conclusions because I’d rather think this known pedophile did it rather than the parents, but he could still be guilty and still be delusional.
It is possible that after ten years, he’s reinvented his memory of the events whether he actually did it or not; his fantasizing about picking her up from school and it being an accident has now become his reality.
And the ex? Well she’d have no reason to come to his defense except she was a child herself when he married her and she bore his children as a child herself. What if she was drawn into his pedophilia either as a willing partner or an observer to other crimes?
She and his first child bride describe him as controlling and manipulative.
And then there’s more confusing and possibly contradictory evidence in the ransom note and a yearbook entry Karr made years earlier.
“The yearbook entry ends with Karr writing in capital block letters, "Though, deep in the future, maybe I shall be the conquerer and live in multiple peace."
“A ransom note found in the Ramsey home ended with the word "Victory!" and was signed "S.B.T.C." Authorities want to know whether those letters might stand for "shall be the conquerer" and whether they could have been written by the same person”.
I can't stand my ex-husband, and would vouch for him for very little, but I can tell without a doubt that we were together every Christmas. I would have remembered if there were any he missed.
It aint over till the fat lady sings. Her song is going to be about DNA.
I'm not sure how some law enforcement groups may act in all cases, but:
These folks out in Colorado, knowing this guy is a real threat to children and that he has done bad things to them already, if the DNA DOES NOT match, I wouldn't put it past them to say that it did match.
We would never know.
Bingo
The guy was doing research on the case........ trying to write a book on the case. He should know a lot.
Right.
On Christmas Day?
That is very interesting.
I was on the fence about Karr being the real killer until I saw the shot of the yearbook entry on TV. I don't know about you, but I have never had (or known) anyone to write in a yearbook "shall be the conqueror". The odds of this being purely coincidental are astronomical
JBR Thread Links Roundup
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1686829/posts
The Ransom note makes no sense. You don't leave a "critically placed" ransom note when the victim is already dead.....
But put it with his latest "Live camera" statement: "It was an accident" and it's one of those "See, I never intended to kill her. The note is proof."
He went on to say "That makes it 2nd degree not 1st degree murder".
He didn't think the note out carefully enough. The note was to prove that "he was smarter and more powerful than John Ramsey" by killing what he loved most. VICTORY
There is no sign of any "love" for Jonbenet in the ransom note.
"What's more, the coroner finds not a trace of either semen on or drugs in the girl. "
I thought they did find DNA in her pants.
Apparently Lee doesn't know that most of us wash new clothes before we wear them (with exceptions).
I think they are Karr's tears and he was "crying" at his own horror......Suwart said the suspect described the encounter as a "BLUR".
From the yearbook:"Sometimes, so BLURRED by my own eyes, I've seen the best things come and go simultaneously".
I think I remember them saying that it looked like her private area was wiped off....that makes sense for tears...
If the SBTC thing was really a trope with him, he will have left it in multiple places down the years. Nutjobs always do. The phrase "multiple peace," though, makes bells ring and sirens sound.
LOL.... not to be glib, but I know Iran's Ahmadinejad hates that phrase these days.
;-)
If you'd read the article, she's not changing her story at all. She's in search of actual proof now instead of going with her initial impression.
CBS News: DNA Rules Out Parents The crime lab has two spots of JonBenet’s blood found on the underwear she was wearing the night of the murder. Mixed in with that blood is the DNA of an unknown person. It has taken years to isolate, but forensic scientists in Colorado now have a complete DNA profile of the killer. They know the killer is a male. What they don’t know is his name.
Augustin and Gray are convinced that the DNA sample belongs to JonBenet’s killer, because of a small amount of matching DNA that also was found under the 6-year-old murder victim’s fingernails.
Thanks much. That's exactly what I wanted to know.
general info on what was found in her panties is here...
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/jonbenet2.html
bottom of second paragraph
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.