now why would they do this? oh yea... hildabeast polls VERY badly in these states... so... try to discount them...
1 posted on
08/19/2006 9:40:23 AM PDT by
sten
To: sten
Party above all else. Old Uncle Joe would be so proud.
2 posted on
08/19/2006 9:42:12 AM PDT by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: sten
The Democrats are imploding into the Lenin Party.
Must see TV.
3 posted on
08/19/2006 9:42:45 AM PDT by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: sten
Aren't primary dates set by the states, not the parties?
4 posted on
08/19/2006 10:00:26 AM PDT by
GoLightly
To: sten
For once the Demos got something right. We do need to get some emphasis on states other than Iowa and New Hampshire.
They've been largely responsible for the string of left wing loonies that the Democrats have nominated in the last several national elections.
5 posted on
08/19/2006 10:01:24 AM PDT by
curmudgeonII
(One man...and the Lord...are a majority.)
To: sten
More evidence of the bullying tactics of the left. The will of the people be damned, the party line must be followed.
To: sten
I thought the pols were elected to represent their districts and states...not their political parties?
7 posted on
08/19/2006 10:06:42 AM PDT by
Bob J
(RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
To: sten
8 posted on
08/19/2006 10:07:38 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: sten
This is an opportunity for Hillary to distance herself from the Dean wing and take full control of the Democrat Party on the basis of "tradition".
10 posted on
08/19/2006 10:21:56 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: sten
Oh my! Will the Democrats have a schism into Old Calendar and New Calendar Democrats?
11 posted on
08/19/2006 10:22:28 AM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: sten
Ah yes, the tolerance of the left is now on display for all to see. Likewise that commitment to upholding free speech. /sarc
12 posted on
08/19/2006 10:34:26 AM PDT by
Conservative Goddess
(Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
To: sten
Actually, this will help the candidate that has the most cash at the START of the primaries as they must campaign in multiple states at once, not just Iowa and New Hampshire.
Again, this plays right into Hillary's hands.
13 posted on
08/19/2006 10:40:06 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: sten
How does the rule apply if you campaign in Massachusetts before the NH primary? Most of southern NH can pick up Bay state TV stations.
14 posted on
08/19/2006 10:43:15 AM PDT by
IpaqMan
To: sten
17 posted on
08/19/2006 11:20:22 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: sten
Gee ... what happen to that big tent the dems like to brag about?
18 posted on
08/19/2006 11:22:26 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: sten
"In 1977, to eliminate any possible future encroachment on the state's tradition of being first, the Legislature further amended the law setting the election date to read, "On the second Tuesday of March, immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold -a similar election, whichever is earlier..... By taking this action the traditional town meeting date and the presidential primary date were once again identical as they had been in 1916"
http://www.politicallibrary.org/NEW_HAMPSIRE_FIR%20(F)/build/index.htm
This should get interesting. NH's law has them always first.
19 posted on
08/19/2006 12:01:30 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson