Posted on 08/18/2006 8:35:08 PM PDT by Graybeard58
Here we go again. War in the Middle East. Instability and violence in Iraq. A confident, bellicose Iran continuing to pursue the capability for nuclear weapons. A terrorist plot intended to cause "mass murder on an unimaginable scale" by blowing up as many as 10 planes over the Atlantic Ocean.
Though elections -- particularly midterms -- are traditionally driven by local concerns and personalities, with just over 80 days to go before voters step behind the curtain and make a choice, the issue of national security is again looming large, as it did in 2002 and 2004.
The domestic political backdrop to the seemingly endless string of dangerous events swirling overseas is an increasingly antiwar Democratic Party, much of which was thrilled by the election of antiwar political neophyte Ned Lamont over three-term incumbent Sen. Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut primary on Aug. 8.
In the ensuing days, Republicans jumped to argue that Lamont's triumph signals that the Democratic Party continues to lurch to the left and remains fundamentally unserious and untrustworthy on matters of national security. Meanwhile, Democrats cried foul, slamming Republicans for suggesting that opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq (which Democrats believe is a quagmire and hopeless failure) somehow equates to an unwillingness to vigorously oppose terrorist threats to the United States.
It certainly feels like we've seen this movie before. Or have we?
After suffering a historic defeat in 2002 thanks in large part to a debate over homeland security and losing to George W. Bush in 2004 in what was essentially a referendum on the president's Iraq policy, Democrats are increasingly confident they can thread the needle this time around, opposing the war in Iraq without losing the confidence of the public on the broader issue of national security.
Democrats point to recent public opinion polls to demonstrate why they think this time will be different. According to the latest Gallup Poll, dissatisfaction with Bush's handling of Iraq is mired near an all-time low. Only 35 percent approve of the way he's dealing with Iraq while 62 percent disapprove, a 21-point net decline from a Gallup Poll preceding the 2004 election. There's been a similar shift in public opinion over whether invading Iraq was a mistake. Today, a majority (56 percent) of Americans think Iraq was a mistake while 41 percent say it was not. In October 2004, those numbers were more or less reversed: 44 percent said it was a mistake, 52 percent said it was not -- again a net 23-point swing against Bush's position and in favor of the Democrats.
Most important for Democrats, however, a few recent surveys show that they have closed a large, longstanding deficit on the issue of national security and now trail Republicans by only a few points on the question of which party is more able to handle the defense of the country.
But the events in London last week have put the spotlight squarely back on the issue of terrorism and will test the proposition of whether Democrats have truly made up ground. In light of the potentially catastrophic results of the most recent terrorist attempt, Republicans are going to force Democrats to defend some of their actions since the 2004 elections as well.
For example, Democrats have absolutely crucified the Bush administration over its NSA terrorist surveillance program, first revealed in the New York Times in December 2005. That same month, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid bragged at a press conference that he and fellow Senate Democrats had successfully led a filibuster and "killed the Patriot Act." In June of this year, Democrats were up in arms again when another leak revealed the existence of a surveillance program to track financial transactions of suspected terrorists.
The Bush administration believes these programs are vital tools in the fight against terrorism, and Bush went out of his way to reiterate as much at an appearance at the National Counterterrorism Center earlier this week. Democrats responded that instead of making America safer over the last five years, the Bush administration has done the opposite.
With control of one, and potentially both chambers of Congress at stake in less than three months, both parties are scrambling for every possible advantage. Though Tip O'Neill once famously stated that "all politics is local," the issues of Iraq and national security will surely be weighing heavily on voters' minds this November.
Don't look now, but Lieberman has opened up a double-digit lead over Lamont.
What a parallel universe. The Dems winning on national security is like a child molestor owning a day care center.
Just like every election since 2000, the Democrat-partisan press thinks if it just writes enough articles about how the Dems are a big ol' electoral juggernaut, that'll make it come true.
I've never seen more deluded journalists than I've seen in the past 5 years. Just mind-boggling.
We have definitely lost the war on drugs when democratic national strategists leave evidence of smoking various recreational phamreceuticals so openly.
Some of the numbers in this story didn't jive. Also, I think the poll numbers were gleaned from a survey done somewhere on the North Coast of California between San Francisco and Oakland.
what you just said is chilling, really
Hey, I thought it fit.
It did.
damn
It's the Josef Goebbels thing about telling a lie often enough and it becomes truth.
A lot of people are too mired in crap like Nip/Tuck and "reality TV" to put anything more into politics than scanning the headlines.
It seems more and more people are waking up to reality though. I think Lieberman will win in November, and even though he's a lib, he's a lib you can reason with. Definitely the lesser of two evils.
And so does anyone whose desire to see Civilization prevail trumps their hatred of one man.
if the terrocreeps strike big while the NSA surveillance is down then libs lose huge in november
...and Cub Scout den by night.
I just turned it into a song with the 30-second JEOPARDY theme. I'll go post it.
Come and mock them in song -- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1686301/posts?page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.