Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What the AP fails to tell (nah, they aren't trying to spin this. They wouldn't do that, would they?) is that that July 20 Quinnipiac poll was taken before Lamont won the primary. After the primary, according to an August 9-10 Rassmussenreports poll, Lieberman led Lamont 46% to 41%, with Schlesinger garnering 6%.

Since then, Lieberman has widened his lead - now 49% to 38 percent, Schlesinger 4% .

Now that this race is among registered voters of all voting persuasions it appears that Liebermnan has solidified his and widened his lead.

Since the Democratic primary, Lieberman has gone from 46% to 49%, and Lamont has dropped from 41% to 38%.

Looks like Lamont's mo has vaporised...

1 posted on 08/17/2006 2:41:57 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If this is true, that's good.

But I'm gonna hold off and wait for another poll to hopefully back up those numbers.


2 posted on 08/17/2006 2:43:32 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Yep, it appears that Lamont's mo has vaporised.

I heard on the Sean Hannity show today that Democrats are really steaming mad now at lieberman for going Independent.

LOL.


3 posted on 08/17/2006 2:43:57 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist (Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

"Ask not for whom the bell tolls..."


4 posted on 08/17/2006 2:44:17 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Ned Lamont, whose anti-war campaign rattled the political landscape by toppling Sen. Joe Lieberman last week in Connecticut's Democratic primary, is gaining support in November's three-way Senate race according to a poll released Thursday...

That's the funniest sentence in the whole story.

MEMO to AP: NED LAMONT WON THE CT PRIMARY!

FOTFLOL!

5 posted on 08/17/2006 2:44:34 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

His appearance on the weekend talking heads show probably didn't impress many lucid Connecticut residence who watched it. I wouldn't buy a used car from that guy.


6 posted on 08/17/2006 2:45:04 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Dont worry Ned, gigilo is throwing his support behind you, you're a sure fire winner, lol, did I mention gigilo was in Viet Nam, yeah, he was!


7 posted on 08/17/2006 2:45:18 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It's good that the AP is trying to spin things in favor of Lamont. It'll keep the moonbat money going toward his hopeless cause.


8 posted on 08/17/2006 2:45:36 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Half of Daily Kosland is wetting their diapers and the other half is saying not to believe in polls. Try telling them that when THEIR guy is ahead.


12 posted on 08/17/2006 2:48:11 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Would it be possible (legal) for Schlesinger to drop out in favor of a competitive Republican candidate? I would sure like to have a real race given that Lieberman is, contrary to the Lamonters' delusions, no conservative. For example, I would think Nancy Johnson could have a chance in a three-way race and would be better in the Senate than Lieberman (who I believe has ACU ratings worse than the worst RINOs, such as Arlen the Specter, Olympia Snowe, Chafee, et al.).


17 posted on 08/17/2006 2:51:18 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Ned Lamont, whose anti-war campaign rattled the political landscape by toppling Sen. Joe Lieberman last week in Connecticut's Democratic primary

That's the Rat party's biggest problem.
To win the primaries, you have to convince the base that you are a radical lefty whackjob.
Then to win the election, you have to convince everyone else that you are not a radical lefty whackjob.

I just read an article two days ago that Lamont is now focusing on the moderate vote. ....Hmmmm, that should be interesting.
19 posted on 08/17/2006 2:51:53 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
49%!!

All Lieberman has to do is keep those numbers and he will win this thing.

25 posted on 08/17/2006 2:56:36 PM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Don't they actually have the 4th candidate from Green party? Why isn't his name in the poll? I believe Joe's number would be higher...


28 posted on 08/17/2006 3:00:14 PM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What the AP fails to tell (nah, they aren't trying to spin this. They wouldn't do that, would they?) is that that July 20 Quinnipiac poll was taken before Lamont won the primary. After the primary, according to an August 9-10 Rassmussenreports poll, Lieberman led Lamont 46% to 41%, with Schlesinger garnering 6%.

I see why you call this spin, but in surfing through a half dozen sites that list polls for the CT race, the July 20th poll is the last one that polled all three men as leader of three different parties. I'd say both polls are correct (or as correct as they come), but I certainly agree that Lieberman is increasing his lead over Lamont.

The liberals are going to be wetting their pants in another couple of weeks. These polls are going to be a huge embarrassment for them and essentially free advertising for Lieberman and the GOP in general.  It's going to be a very loud statement that 52% of screwballs in the primary wanted Lamont, but the majority of sound-minded people prefer Joe when it really counts.


32 posted on 08/17/2006 3:06:24 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I was gonna say- I heard that poll as well...so how the hell is Ned gaining support???


34 posted on 08/17/2006 3:10:10 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Lieberman beating Lamont in November is a FAR better outcome than him beating him in August.

I really hope he pulls it off.
36 posted on 08/17/2006 3:14:00 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

13:28...13:27...13:26...

His time is ticking away.


40 posted on 08/17/2006 3:17:44 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If you don't believe the world is turned upside down, consider. Conservative talk show hosts are all beating the drum for Joe Lieberman, a lifelong, dedicated socialist who has voted the straight liberal line for his entire career.

This nice gentlemen wants to take your money, freedoms and liberty in the name of the state. He favors every liberal idea that comes down the pike except for his position on the war on terrorism.

And that puts him opposite Lamont whose father, Corliss Lamont, was one of the largest fund raisers for Stalin and the cause of international communism. Roots.


41 posted on 08/17/2006 3:19:28 PM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; RobFromGa
More good news.

There are several DUmmie Senators who are also sticking with Joe.

Michael Moore and Moveon wanted Joe kicked off Senate Committees and ...
42 posted on 08/17/2006 3:20:39 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

According to this poll Lamont leads Schlessinger among Republicans by 13% to 10% (http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11362.xml?ReleaseID=948). Does any one understand this?


46 posted on 08/17/2006 3:30:54 PM PDT by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

A month ago, Rasmussen had the two tied at 40% each and Republican Alan Schlesinger was 13%.

Looks like Joe has the Big Mo!


48 posted on 08/17/2006 3:40:09 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson