Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond
Nothing wrong with that at the time, either, but at the same time the publication cannot really be cited as an example of a "peer reviewed" publication in the modern sense.

As you pointed out, the question is somewhat moot.

TODAY, scientific findings must be published in recognzied scientific journals and peer-reviewed.

And the document being referenced was neither.

507 posted on 08/25/2006 11:08:33 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
And the document being referenced was neither.

It was peer reviewed by scientists and published in a scientific journal. Whether you think the journal is "respectable" or not is not by itself dispositive of the validity of any scientific hypothesis or data.

Cordially,

510 posted on 08/25/2006 11:40:21 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson