Because if it is not published in a recognized scientific journal and peer-reviewed then it is just meaningless words -- like Asimov's famous "thiotimoline" article -- and is thus classified with the other works I listed.
It is genetic fallacy to reject the validity of scientific data based on the political or religious views of the source. If you can produce some contrary bore hole data, let's see it. Until then comparison of the research to a comic strip is empty bluster.
What in the heck is a "genetic fallacy?" Again, I don't need to provide an argument against something that doesn't exist in the science milleu.
Well I guess The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life is meaningless words, then. Better chalk up Heisenberg and his Uncertainty Principle and the Friedmann and his cosmological model as meaningless words, because neither paper was published in a peer reviewed journal either.
Cordially,