Actually she shreaded your Archaeopteryx so called reptile bird that came after bird fossils. Again you guys spin and twist every fossil to try to make it into something it isn't. If anything it is nothing more than an extinct species.
If evolution was fact there would be millions and millions of species from ameoba to man and that is not the case. Every so called example has serious questions.
I do admire your faith in your religion though. You guys act like everyone has to believe in what you believe in or it is heresy to the Sanhedrin of Evolution. Those Saintly Scientists have been wrong far more they have been right and this is another example of Junk Science.
Ann knocked Humpty Darwin off the Wall.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Shalom Israel
I suggest you read a few of the refutations of her words on this subject before concluding she did anything more than mouth off about something she knows too little to mouth off about.
Again you guys spin and twist every fossil to try to make it into something it isn't. If anything it is nothing more than an extinct species.
If an organism which clearly shows features of both reptiles and birds including features that are diagnostic for one or the other is not a transitional, what features do you believe a creature half way between a dinosaur and bird should exhibit?
This is an important question if you desire to do more than just repeatedly define transitionals away, performing as it were an argument by redefinition. It goes to your ability to objectively consider evidence rather than just hand-wave it away.