[Publius6961]

European investigators last week confirmed that a pioneering oral cancer researcher in Norway had fabricated much of his work. The news left experts in his field with a pressing question: What should they believe now? Suppose his findings, which precisely identified people at high risk of the deadly disease, were accurate even though data were faked?

Supposing pigs could fly?

This article simply reinfoprces my absolute belief that most scientists today are charlatans.
If you held a gun to my head and forced me to identify one cause, I would be forced to say the insinuation of the gay perverts where they don't belong.

[NaughtiusMaximus]

SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS HAVE DETERMINED THAT THEIR SALARIES DEPEND ON PLEASING POLITICIANS

[.cnI redruM]

>>>>This article simply reinfoprces my absolute belief that most scientists today are charlatans


I'd say modern scientists are payed for their results. Their employers know their normative stand on a given research issue and use it to predict the outcome of the 'research'. This makes them more like hired guns than actual scientists.

[aruanan]

Si la mierda fuera oro, los pobres no estarian en culo.