Liberal Carter appointee wants to open the door to more 9/11s, courtesy of the ACLU.
1 posted on
08/17/2006 9:17:51 AM PDT by
Enchante
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Enchante
Pathetic little twerp judge that will get overruled faster than you can say 'speeding bullet'.
To: Enchante
What unmitigated BS.
But it was okay that Clinton ran the Eschelon program which listened to phone calls and read e-mails.
4 posted on
08/17/2006 9:20:19 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Enchante
I have two short words for her and her master from georgia F.U.
Read my Tag Line
5 posted on
08/17/2006 9:20:43 AM PDT by
TimesDomain
(When a judge declares himself "MASTER", you become his "SLAVE")
To: Enchante; All
How would the NSA come under her jurisdiction?
6 posted on
08/17/2006 9:21:00 AM PDT by
dighton
To: Enchante
I thought the program was about matching phone numbers/calling patterns and only went to actual listening after warrants to do so were authorized under usual laws.
In fact I read somewhere that the numbers being compared by NSA were themselves coded and that it took a warrant to get the actual phone numbers from the phone companies. Did I get it all wrong ?
(Oh, and let's not forget it was intercepted comms that led to the discovery of the UK bomb plots last week.)
8 posted on
08/17/2006 9:22:53 AM PDT by
1066AD
To: Enchante
Which circuit will hear the appeal?
Thanks, Jimmah, by the way, for keeping us safe.
Putz.
9 posted on
08/17/2006 9:22:59 AM PDT by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." - Douglas MacArthur)
To: Enchante
"lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. "Just doing the job most Americans won't do? Like spilling intelligence secrets to Bash Bush? Like giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of War?
Exactly what "public interest" is served by protecting leakers and disclosing secret intelligence info?
To: Enchante
Said it before-- lousy liberals say WOT is "law-enforcement" problem, but don't want to give law-enforcement the most basic tools to do the job.
They're hopeless.
11 posted on
08/17/2006 9:25:02 AM PDT by
agooga
(For they sow the wind, and they will reap the whirlwind.)
To: Enchante
I was thinking Clinton appointee, but Carter appointee may be even worse.
14 posted on
08/17/2006 9:27:04 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Enchante
Biography
Prior to her appointment to the Federal Court in 1979, Judge Taylor was a private practitioner, a legislative assistant, an Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor, an Assistant United States Attorney, an Adjunct Professor of Law at Wayne State Law School, and an Assistant Corporation Counselor, City of Detroit. She is a 1950 Graduate of the Northfield School for Girls, East Northfield, Massachusetts, and received her B.A. from Barnard College in 1954 and L.L.B. from Yale Law School in 1957. Judge Taylor was appointed to the bench on November 2, 1979.
She is a Trustee of the Detroit Institute of Arts, the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan and the Henry Ford Health System.
She is a member of the State Bar (Committees on Character and Fitness and on U.S. Courts), Federal Bar, Wolverine Bar, Black Judges Association and Women Judges Association.
15 posted on
08/17/2006 9:27:36 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: Enchante
Yes, of course it is unconstitutional to spy on the terrorists. We violated their freedom to blow up planes over the Atlantic and kill a couple of thousand people. Whatever was Bush thinking?
17 posted on
08/17/2006 9:29:46 AM PDT by
Eva
To: Enchante
Another example of how the Democrats will keep us safe?
Democrats and their appointees do everything they can to enable Muslim terrorists to kill as many Americans as possible.
18 posted on
08/17/2006 9:31:41 AM PDT by
twntaipan
(I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than ride in Ted Kennedy's car.)
To: Enchante
It appears the government argued it could not reveal details of the program because that would endanger national security. Rather than first rule on that, sounds like the judge then accepted the plaintiffs' version of the facts and ruled on the whole case. That strikes me as an extremely injudicious course of action.
25 posted on
08/17/2006 9:36:15 AM PDT by
Williams
To: Enchante
These senior judges are a poor lot IMO.
Several times they seem to be making absurd decisions based only on their prejudices and desires.
IOW: they just don't care how their work is viewed.
Justice is too important for frivolous judges.
28 posted on
08/17/2006 9:44:26 AM PDT by
mrsmith
To: Enchante
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program "first judge to strike down" - Something that would put a smile on any tyrants face I would think.
33 posted on
08/17/2006 9:51:29 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Humility is not thinking less of oneself; humility is thinking about oneself less.)
To: Enchante
Jimmy Carter - the gift that keeps on giving./sarc.
34 posted on
08/17/2006 9:52:08 AM PDT by
BW2221
To: Enchante
Amazing that the left had no issues with Clinton's very broad-spectrum, fuzzy focused, "echelon" program that would intercept millions of emails and phone calls from everyone as it looked for "key words".
President Bush's program is limited to known IP addresses and cell numbers taken from the terrorists.
All Clinton had to do was change key words from "bomb" and "osama" to "republican" and "conservative" and he would track political opponents (Filegate anyone?). Bush's program only goes after IP addresses found on computers taken from the terrorists. If a terrorists visits websites from his "safe house" in Iraq, I think we should know what he was doing. We use the exact same procedures for fighting drug lords and pedophile rings. Yet somehow what Bush is doing is wrong, but what Clinton did is ok?
The idiocy of the left never ceases to amaze me.
36 posted on
08/17/2006 10:04:25 AM PDT by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: Enchante
another gift from the dickless wonder from Georgia
37 posted on
08/17/2006 10:15:38 AM PDT by
Yankee
To: Enchante
"Liberal Carter appointee wants to open the door to more 9/11s, courtesy of the ACLU." Not sure how the timetables work on appeals but I would but a sizable sum that any appeals will not happen till after November.
Master stroke on political manuevers by the libtards.
40 posted on
08/17/2006 10:18:24 AM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
To: Enchante
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor
43 posted on
08/17/2006 11:21:40 AM PDT by
ThePythonicCow
(We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson