Skip to comments.
Federal Judge rules NSA surveillance unconstitutional!
ABC Radio News
| 8/17/2006
| ABC Radio News
Posted on 08/17/2006 9:06:43 AM PDT by sinkspur
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 581-586 next last
To: SueRae; All
Update: Judge ordered immediate halt to the program.
A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.
http://michellemalkin.com/
121
posted on
08/17/2006 9:39:49 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(Kofi anti-Semite who sucks up to Arab dictators and presides over UN choking on its own filth-JPod)
To: Steve_Seattle; All
==Right now Scalia is probably thinking, with reference to Judge Taylor, "Bring it on!"==
Exactly. The fed. judge ruling is just the first step of this issue most likely going up to the Supremes.
122
posted on
08/17/2006 9:40:13 AM PDT
by
OnRightOnLeftCoast
(U.S. government: Voluntary laws and policies assuring self-destruction)
To: Let's Roll
123
posted on
08/17/2006 9:40:28 AM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: JFC
Thank You Jimmy!!!!! I Say We Blow His ASS
To: MikefromOhio
I don't think he should just ignore them, that is a very dangerous precedent to set.I don't agree with the ruling, but I do agree with your statement.
125
posted on
08/17/2006 9:41:19 AM PDT
by
eyespysomething
(There is no such thing as global warming. Chuck Norris was cold, so he turned the sun up.)
To: hipaatwo
And if the 6th Circuit doesn't overturn, then SCOTUS will.
126
posted on
08/17/2006 9:42:00 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Let's Roll
Yes, but it's been rare in our history.
To: tumblindice
128
posted on
08/17/2006 9:42:09 AM PDT
by
King of Florida
(A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
Comment #129 Removed by Moderator
To: All
Well? Has the Administration filed a motion at higher court to vacate this ruling pending additional review? Why does the Adminstration never seem to be prepared for these things?
130
posted on
08/17/2006 9:42:44 AM PDT
by
Owen
To: Puppage
Well more like Michigistan (pronounced Meshuggahstan)
131
posted on
08/17/2006 9:43:21 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: Pyro7480
Why is it we never heard Republican former presidents travelling the world flapping their gums?
132
posted on
08/17/2006 9:44:07 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
To: Owen
How do you know the administration is/was unprepared for this or any other ruling?
133
posted on
08/17/2006 9:44:13 AM PDT
by
babaloo
To: stan_sipple
Sikhs don't carry scimitars. They bear a small knife as a symbol of baptism - can't remember the name of it.
134
posted on
08/17/2006 9:44:19 AM PDT
by
drungus
To: mewzilla
They better overturn this stupid ass ruling.
135
posted on
08/17/2006 9:44:48 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(Kofi anti-Semite who sucks up to Arab dictators and presides over UN choking on its own filth-JPod)
To: sinkspur
America does not have the will to survive. That's what this will mean to me, if this stands.
I want to hear what Mark Levin has to say about this.
136
posted on
08/17/2006 9:46:20 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: hipaatwo
They will. The good news is, though, that the Dems just took another shot to the bow while this works its way up the judicial food chain. It's reminding Americans again why electing 'Rats and RINOs won't do if we're serious about fighting and winning the WOT.
137
posted on
08/17/2006 9:46:46 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: MikefromOhio
The Government can't win as long as there is judge shopping and that's exactly what happened here. They filed hundreds of lawsuits around the country but held on to the ones that bagged liberal judges then dumped the rest. If President Bush was to work within this corrupt judicial system then right now our national security is over because he can't even listen to the terrorist until the appeal. If I was a terrorist overseas I would be activating my cells in this country right now.
138
posted on
08/17/2006 9:46:48 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: mewzilla
And if the 6th Circuit doesn't overturn, then SCOTUS will. It will be close, especially with Ginsberg, Breyer, Souter, and Stevens being the pro-ACLU and terrorist bloc.
Kennedy would be the swing vote and he is a good friend of ultra liberal Lawrence Tribe.
139
posted on
08/17/2006 9:47:07 AM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Pyro7480
sorry,
delenda est means "is destroyed"
Perhaps you mean something more like Columnam quintam esse delendam.
140
posted on
08/17/2006 9:47:28 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 581-586 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson