Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google wants people to stop googling
ZDNet ^ | August 16, 2006 | Will Sturgeon

Posted on 08/16/2006 3:11:01 PM PDT by holymoly

Google has said it intends to crack down on the use of its name as a generic verb, in phrases such as "to google someone."

The Internet search giant said such phrases were potentially damaging to its brand.

"We think it's important to make the distinction between using the word 'Google' to describe using Google to search the Internet and using the word 'google' to generally describe searching the Internet. It has some serious trademark issues," a representative for the search company said.

Julie Coleman, an authority on linguistics from the University of Leicester, said she could understand Google's concerns.

"The prestige associated with a trademark is lost if people use it generically, so I do see Google's point. They also do lots more than just search, so maybe they're reluctant for their brand name to be restricted in this way," Coleman said.

But Coleman added that once new words enter into common usage, it is impossible to stop their use.

"Google can't possibly stop the spread of the verb," Coleman said. "Normal people are using it in normal conversation and in writing, and they aren't likely to face legal proceedings."

What Google could do, said Coleman, is "force dictionaries to mention its origin in a trademarked brand name, which is what the Oxford English Dictionary already does."

Even if Google's attempts to stop this misuse of its trademark turn out to be in vain, many argue it shouldn't even be trying.

Members of the blogging community have suggested it is a sign that Google is losing its once-cool facade and that the search giant is taking itself too seriously.

One blogger also suggested Google has missed the obvious compliment in all this, which is that the use is evidence the company now owns the search industry.

"This should be the ultimate compliment, and I cannot believe Google sees it differently," blogger and computing graduate Frank Gruber wrote.

Steve Rubel, another blogger, branded it "one of the worst PR moves in history".

Morgan McLintic, a PR executive based in the heart of Silicon Valley, said Google should certainly learn when to love its addition to the English language.

"'Googling' is already common parlance for searching on the Internet," McLintic wrote. "And there is only one place you go to 'google,' so this is a good thing for Google with a capital 'G'. The media's use of the verb is simply a reflection of everyday use."

Google's move reflects the concerns of other businesses, such as Xerox, which has complained that its brand has become a generic term for photocopying respectively. Apple Computer is also taking action to defend "iPod."

AOL is another technology company that has fought the tendency of brands to become generic. It has contacting media outlets in the past over the use of "instant messenger" to describe any IM application, claiming that to be its brand.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: 2late; aspirin; google; internetsearch; laundromat; shmoogle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last
To: holymoly

As always their legal dept has to justify its miserable existence and so it tells them to do this.
They will never stop it. They have become too big for their britches.


81 posted on 08/16/2006 4:03:35 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (American Left, Islamic Fascism, Mainstream Media = ideology of nihilism, despair, nothingness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

I'll throw up a Post It note to remind myself later.


82 posted on 08/16/2006 4:03:48 PM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: blau993
Coca Cola zealously guards its "Coke" trademark. That's one of the reasons a flight attendant asks you whether Pepsi would be OK when they don't have Coke.

OK, so what does Coke do about all those people from the south (mostly Texans), who, when asked if they want a Coke, they tell them what kind of "Coke" (i.e. 7Up, Sprite, Dr. Pepper, etc.). "Coke" has thus become synonymous with "soda" or "pop".

83 posted on 08/16/2006 4:04:01 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
I agree. Ordinary folks using the term for their own noncommercial purposes have nothing to fear and in fact aren't the target. What Google needs to prevent is a genericization such that it's competitors could start using the term.
84 posted on 08/16/2006 4:04:40 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Oh-kay.

Thanks for the informative insight. 8^)


85 posted on 08/16/2006 4:05:05 PM PDT by airborne (Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky

Great minds think alike (see my post immediately above ;-).


86 posted on 08/16/2006 4:05:39 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
They're obviously right. Look how the Coca Cola companies have suffered from having 'coke' used as a generic term for pop! /s

I think Google might be trying some reverse psychology here. Surely they're not that stupid.

87 posted on 08/16/2006 4:07:45 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (A member of the Appalachian-American minority -- and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

It does sound funny: "Dogpile it!" Now that I mention it, if I went back ten years and said in front of people "just google it" I would get a lot of strange looks.


88 posted on 08/16/2006 4:10:15 PM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
You will receive a bill in the mail for using their trademark.

Wonder what they are going to do about these people?

Black Google Eyes Contact Lens Case

89 posted on 08/16/2006 4:11:38 PM PDT by FJ290
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Hey Google - Scroogle you!


90 posted on 08/16/2006 4:16:36 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FJ290
I wonder if they have to pay royalties to this guy?


91 posted on 08/16/2006 4:17:00 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

Personally I prefer !Yahoo anyway...


92 posted on 08/16/2006 4:19:29 PM PDT by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
Waaaaaaaaaaaah!

I'm too popular!

Better hurry and drink the lefty's Kool-Aid.

93 posted on 08/16/2006 4:20:37 PM PDT by MooseMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I wonder if they have to pay royalties to this guy?

ROFLOL!

94 posted on 08/16/2006 4:21:34 PM PDT by FJ290
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
I suppose it's like people using the word "Kleenex" in reference to any brand of tissue. We all know how devastating that's been to Kimberly-Clark, don't we? Morons.

Can I make a Xerox copy of your comment?

95 posted on 08/16/2006 4:22:05 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Don`t forget "a pair of guys who ripped off Yahoo" as well. Stopped using them myself when that China thing came out, also was`t suprised since one of them is a Russian. Guess that Commie thing is always in the blood. Yahoo is all I use now, and they have much more than what those two turds could ever offer. Always stick with the original.


96 posted on 08/16/2006 4:22:48 PM PDT by Screamname (Batman and Godzilla : When will they fight?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

I think I'll throw this whole discussion right where it belongs, in the Crapper. What a legacy Mr. Crapper gave us. Ooops, I used his trademark twice, better send 4 cents to the Crapper family.


97 posted on 08/16/2006 4:25:56 PM PDT by MooseMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

I imagine Barney Google could sue the pants of those guys...infringement, indeed.


98 posted on 08/16/2006 4:28:39 PM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Maybe they would like GOOGLE = AGREES WITH CHINESE CENSORSHIP..?

99 posted on 08/16/2006 4:30:44 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MooseMan

This reminds me of when Spike Lee sued Spike TV for using his name, and he actually got paid if you can believe it. What gets me is that idiots name isn`t even Spike, it`s "Shelton", plus where does he get off claiming ownership of the name "Spike" when so many Spikes were before him? Spike Milligan, Spike Jonze, Spike Robinson, even Snoopys brother in Peanuts was named Spike well before Shelton was even born.


100 posted on 08/16/2006 4:34:37 PM PDT by Screamname (Batman and Godzilla : When will they fight?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson