Wonder what they are going to do about these people?
Posted on 08/16/2006 3:11:01 PM PDT by holymoly
Google has said it intends to crack down on the use of its name as a generic verb, in phrases such as "to google someone."
The Internet search giant said such phrases were potentially damaging to its brand.
"We think it's important to make the distinction between using the word 'Google' to describe using Google to search the Internet and using the word 'google' to generally describe searching the Internet. It has some serious trademark issues," a representative for the search company said.
Julie Coleman, an authority on linguistics from the University of Leicester, said she could understand Google's concerns.
"The prestige associated with a trademark is lost if people use it generically, so I do see Google's point. They also do lots more than just search, so maybe they're reluctant for their brand name to be restricted in this way," Coleman said.
But Coleman added that once new words enter into common usage, it is impossible to stop their use.
"Google can't possibly stop the spread of the verb," Coleman said. "Normal people are using it in normal conversation and in writing, and they aren't likely to face legal proceedings."
What Google could do, said Coleman, is "force dictionaries to mention its origin in a trademarked brand name, which is what the Oxford English Dictionary already does."
Even if Google's attempts to stop this misuse of its trademark turn out to be in vain, many argue it shouldn't even be trying.
Members of the blogging community have suggested it is a sign that Google is losing its once-cool facade and that the search giant is taking itself too seriously.
One blogger also suggested Google has missed the obvious compliment in all this, which is that the use is evidence the company now owns the search industry.
"This should be the ultimate compliment, and I cannot believe Google sees it differently," blogger and computing graduate Frank Gruber wrote.
Steve Rubel, another blogger, branded it "one of the worst PR moves in history".
Morgan McLintic, a PR executive based in the heart of Silicon Valley, said Google should certainly learn when to love its addition to the English language.
"'Googling' is already common parlance for searching on the Internet," McLintic wrote. "And there is only one place you go to 'google,' so this is a good thing for Google with a capital 'G'. The media's use of the verb is simply a reflection of everyday use."
Google's move reflects the concerns of other businesses, such as Xerox, which has complained that its brand has become a generic term for photocopying respectively. Apple Computer is also taking action to defend "iPod."
AOL is another technology company that has fought the tendency of brands to become generic. It has contacting media outlets in the past over the use of "instant messenger" to describe any IM application, claiming that to be its brand.
As always their legal dept has to justify its miserable existence and so it tells them to do this.
They will never stop it. They have become too big for their britches.
I'll throw up a Post It note to remind myself later.
OK, so what does Coke do about all those people from the south (mostly Texans), who, when asked if they want a Coke, they tell them what kind of "Coke" (i.e. 7Up, Sprite, Dr. Pepper, etc.). "Coke" has thus become synonymous with "soda" or "pop".
Oh-kay.
Thanks for the informative insight. 8^)
Great minds think alike (see my post immediately above ;-).
I think Google might be trying some reverse psychology here. Surely they're not that stupid.
It does sound funny: "Dogpile it!" Now that I mention it, if I went back ten years and said in front of people "just google it" I would get a lot of strange looks.
Wonder what they are going to do about these people?
Hey Google - Scroogle you!
Personally I prefer !Yahoo anyway...
I'm too popular!
Better hurry and drink the lefty's Kool-Aid.
ROFLOL!
Can I make a Xerox copy of your comment?
Don`t forget "a pair of guys who ripped off Yahoo" as well. Stopped using them myself when that China thing came out, also was`t suprised since one of them is a Russian. Guess that Commie thing is always in the blood. Yahoo is all I use now, and they have much more than what those two turds could ever offer. Always stick with the original.
I think I'll throw this whole discussion right where it belongs, in the Crapper. What a legacy Mr. Crapper gave us. Ooops, I used his trademark twice, better send 4 cents to the Crapper family.
I imagine Barney Google could sue the pants of those guys...infringement, indeed.
This reminds me of when Spike Lee sued Spike TV for using his name, and he actually got paid if you can believe it. What gets me is that idiots name isn`t even Spike, it`s "Shelton", plus where does he get off claiming ownership of the name "Spike" when so many Spikes were before him? Spike Milligan, Spike Jonze, Spike Robinson, even Snoopys brother in Peanuts was named Spike well before Shelton was even born.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.