Ummm how can it not be true and then you go on to state numbers, that maybe came from a study? Perhaps that study was important in helping to find a vaccine for certain HPV's? You countered your own argument with what you were arguing about there.
My point being not all of these "studies" have no agenda behind them. In trying to prove smoking causes cervical cancer it was determined it doesn't, yet they continue to claim it does.
A vaccine for HPV has been developed, a vaccine that cuold go a long way in preventing cervical cancer...........but instead of getting information out about that, the anti-smoker agenda driven medical community continues to claim smoking causes cervical cancer. They are wasting money on propaganda rather than getting proper information out about this vaccine and the primary cause of cervical cancer.