Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2

Yes. But the mothers lungs would filter out any effects from the smoke before it is passed through the blood stream to the fetus.
The article is saying that her smoke 'directly effects' the fetus's lungs, which is not possible since the fetus does not breathe air until after it is born.
= = = =

WRONG.

I suppose it's predictable given how little thought out it is.

CHEMICALS. CHEMICALS. CHEMICALS.

Sigh.


76 posted on 08/16/2006 9:21:23 AM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

Maybe you need to start posting to the 'anger management' thread since you seem to have a problem with SHOUTING!

When my kids used to shout, I just ignored them. Which I will do with you.

Come back when you can have a 'civil' discussion.

bye now!


88 posted on 08/16/2006 9:24:01 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: Quix

I tried saying earlier to him that nicotine,as well as other chemicals are converted into carcinogens in the liver, our normal blood filter place, and is put back into the bloodstream thus it is able to be readily transferred to the fetus.


89 posted on 08/16/2006 9:24:52 AM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson