nailed it.
This must present a real dilemma for the moonbats; anti-smoking versus concern for unborn children.
Why would they care if the unborn child is injured by secondhand smoke since they advocate aborting all unborn children anyway?
All of us who grew up in the 40s, 50s, and 60s, more often surrounded by the smoke of our parents and others, were healthier than most kids are today. I mean, hasn't the incidence of childhood asthma been going up as the number of smokers has gone down?