Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froufrou

"I don't have any explanation other than the mother's inhalation being taken in through the lungs to filtrate somehow from their to the fetus' circulatory system, which they share until the umbilicus is severed."

Yes. But the mothers lungs would filter out any effects from the smoke before it is passed through the blood stream to the fetus.
The article is saying that her smoke 'directly effects' the fetus's lungs, which is not possible since the fetus does not breathe air until after it is born.

This study raises more questions than it purports to answer.


26 posted on 08/16/2006 8:47:52 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2

Yes. But the mothers lungs would filter out any effects from the smoke before it is passed through the blood stream to the fetus.
The article is saying that her smoke 'directly effects' the fetus's lungs, which is not possible since the fetus does not breathe air until after it is born.
= = = =

WRONG.

I suppose it's predictable given how little thought out it is.

CHEMICALS. CHEMICALS. CHEMICALS.

Sigh.


76 posted on 08/16/2006 9:21:23 AM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson