[Publius6961]

This is not really rocket science, folks.

Well, the "scientific" method appears to be to most on this thread.
That's shouldn't be rocket science either.

I'm afraid that using the word "carcinogen", without a context, is just posturing and demagoguering.

[aft_lizard]

I'm afraid that using the word "carcinogen", without a context, is just posturing and demagoguering.>>>

I believe that if anybody wants to complain and pretend to be an expert on studies then they better have there lingo down, or they dont even belong in the discussion at all.

[Quix]

I'm afraid that using the word "carcinogen", without a context, is just posturing and demagoguering.
= = = = =

Perhaps the SIMPLE SOLID FACT was missed that

the context

is unborn children and young children in the presence of second hand smoke . . . and the context of their lung cells coping with the onslaught of the resulting destructive chemicals and compounds originating in that second hand smoke.

I didn't realize that was a difficult context to grasp.