Posted on 08/16/2006 8:25:06 AM PDT by Moonman62
"I fail to see the cognative dissonance. "
I figured as much.
= = = =
Thankfully, I have found that my perception and assessment skills on such matters are markedly above average on a number of measures and in a variety of contexts with a diversity of factors and issues. So, I think I'll rest very comfortably in that knowledge.
The most arrogance being displayed on this thread comes from your direction. I have breaking news for you. Your shit stinks!
"Thankfully, I have found that my perception and assessment skills on such matters are markedly above average on a number of measures and in a variety of contexts with a diversity of factors and issues. So, I think I'll rest very comfortably in that knowledge."
So, let me guess:
God himself has given you divine insight into these matters, and the opinions of mere mortals do not apply.
Not only don't these opinions apply, but lowly mortals such as myself have NO RIGHT to question your mission of divine intervention.
You have to be one of the most arrogant people on this whole forum.
And, the fact that you state this, and obviously believe it, leads me to believe that you're nothing but a fool.
can sure be psychotic offenses
"
Assuming "carcinogens" do make it into the bloodstream, then there would be no reason to be specific about the baby's lungs. These "carcinogens" would be just as likely to affect the baby's pancreas or stomach.
But this "scientific" article focused upon lungs. Why?
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.