Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
Doesn't seem like justice to me.

Insurance is a contract.

Injustice would be making the insurer pay for something that wasn't in the contract.

You're one of those people who believe in injustice for the deepest pockets, aren't you?

41 posted on 08/16/2006 5:37:43 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes, but the law requires everyone to be insured in order to protect the guys you might run into. Shouldn't the law require them to protect those people whether it was an accident, or intentional? It's not purely a contractual thing. The guy he ran into did not agree to it.

Of course, if that's the law, then that's the law. But I'm not sure it really is the law. The suicide clause was obviously intended to prevent the survivors of someone who commits suicide from collecting. But was it intented to prevent someone who was injured as an innocent bystander to the suicide? I question that.


62 posted on 08/16/2006 6:39:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson