Posted on 08/15/2006 5:19:13 PM PDT by Urbane_Guerilla
No we moved from Complete Denial to Groggy Imprecise Awareness. Next up, Homicidal Rage.
Have patience. It is progress.
You are right! It actually is progress. How pathetic is that? I was actually pleased and then annoyed to hear him say it.
People, we aren't fighting fascists and we aren't building friggin democracies.
Geez. Its been 5 damn years now.
Don't worry, get some sleep. Orwell's reputation will be just fine. Just don't start using the term Orwellian to describe anything and I think he will be OK.
memo to self - fascism is as fascism does.
I'm very impressed that you've managed to find a religious world view that should effectively alienate you from pretty much 100% of the world's Christians, Muslims, Jews AND atheists. That's quite an achievement!
Happily, I belong to none of those groups.
They're barbaric alright.
Just curious ... where does this leave jihad? Does it do what it does? And if so, then why not call it what it is?
Here is what I do not understand.
Why are folks so passionate about calling islam and jihad fascist, when calling islam, islam, and jihad, jihad, is about as good as it gets?
Please explain the advantages to me.
I guess it really doesn't matter anyway. George Bush today backed off his characterization of "islamic fascists" and called them "an extremist group of folks". I kid you not.
You do know who Mussolini was don't you?
Anyway, before Mussolini there was Rome, and the one we know most about was the Eastern Empire. That's the one the Moslems picked apart piece by piece over a 700 year period. While doing so they gradually absorbed the facist technique, method, principles, and ideology.
I would never use the word orwellian to describe anything. Did you know that when you change even a proper name into an adjective, you don't capitalize it?
Orwell was a commie ~ he's addressing an audience of leftwingnuts for whom "fascism" had a meaning totally divorced from its reality.
We have entirely too many fascist judges who like to see babies juggled on the ends of bayonets.
So, in fighting the Outlaws, why don't we just call them Hell's Outlaws?
After all, the Hell's Angels are better known and more readily identifiable.
"Islamo-" has to do with the "flavor", and "jihad" is simply one of a number of techniques within the broad parameters of the "-ism".
Somebody has been listening to too much of MSM.
yitbos
yitbos
We're fighting something that has yet to be named in the Middle East.
I cringe every time I hear "war on terror".
Terror and terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy.
The jihadis, the term you prefer, are quite fascistic. Esp. in their desire for the imposition of their sick Sharia law. You can call them jihadis, I use that term myself, but I would not discount entirely that jihad can be used as a term for "self-struggle", although I don't know enough about Islam to be sure that is accurate.
It is silly to say we are in a war against Islam, the Islamofacists abuse and murder of their brother and sister Muslims around the world demonstrates that. It may become a war agasint all of Islam, but we are not there yet.
I think Islamo-fascism describes them quite well. The Nazis were fascists, but they also had weird paganistic ideas, although I doubt the average German had much truck with that quasi-religious aspect of Nazism. But again, I really don't know for sure.
And the Muslims do not "worship" Mohammed, just as Roman Catholics do not "worship" the Virigin Mary or the Saints.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.