you could answer the above article in two words: ned lamont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: JohnLongIsland
The Dems are seeing double.
3 posted on
08/14/2006 9:03:04 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: JohnLongIsland
The British are Coming...the British are coming
Sirhan Sirhan
Duran Duran
4 posted on
08/14/2006 9:04:26 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: JohnLongIsland
All the GOP has to do is show that one clip of Harry Reid boasting "we killed the Patriot Act". It is hysterical to watch Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton talk tough on security
To: JohnLongIsland
Sure they find Security issues important. They should stop interfering with the administration so they can do their job.
All the "Progressive Marxist Left" has is obstructing the progress of our security and making America more vulnerable to attack. They say they have answers. But they have had ample time to tell America and America what the answers are.
They are full of hot polluted air that the EPA should ban.
7 posted on
08/14/2006 9:11:46 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: JohnLongIsland
Why is the New York Times spilling the beans on the last strategy briefing they got at the DNC?
To: JohnLongIsland
What would Dennis Kucinich do?
10 posted on
08/14/2006 9:15:28 PM PDT by
claudiustg
(Equivalence is depravity.)
To: JohnLongIsland
Don't democrats need to understand what National and Security means first?
11 posted on
08/14/2006 9:17:51 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: JohnLongIsland
Democrats say they are determined not to cede the issue this year and are working to cast President Bush as having diminished the nations safety. In related news of the absurd, Democrats are working to convince you that having more money in your pocket instead of giving it to the government is bad for you, and that freedom is slavery, and that night is actually day...
12 posted on
08/14/2006 9:21:49 PM PDT by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: JohnLongIsland
Cut-N-Run DemocRATS guaranteeing our "security." LOL!
Listening to talk radio today, I noticed a lot of the Leftwing, seminar callers whining about the "innocent" Iraqis and Lebonese civilians who have died in the WOT. That made me think. Like the French, the DemocRATS obviously believe that it is better to surrender than let "innocent civilians" be killed during a war. When the WOT lands on America's shores, and it will, what do you think the DemocRATS are going to do? I believe we'll hear, "We can't have 'innocent civilians' getting killed just to save America from a bunch of Islamic fanatics."
13 posted on
08/14/2006 9:28:40 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Before you respond to that poll, imagine flying coach and Abdul just became your new pilot.)
To: JohnLongIsland
Democrats are going to convince us they are stronger on defense because they wouldn't have gone into Iraq and insread "saved" our military for something more important. Like what? They can't tell you but they'll know it when they see it. Yep, that's a winner. Brother. What a bunch of butt monkeys.
15 posted on
08/14/2006 9:32:12 PM PDT by
lp boonie
(Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement)
To: JohnLongIsland
A lot will depend on how the November election is framed. If the security issue is framed as the war in Iraq, the advantage, sad to say, goes to the terminally critical Dems.
If the issue is framed as the War on (Islamic) Terrorism, advantage goes to the GOP.
If the question is national security, the answer can never be the dems.
16 posted on
08/14/2006 9:33:51 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: JohnLongIsland
After being outmaneuvered in the politics of national security in the last two elections, Democrats say they are determined not to cede the issue this year and are working to cast President Bush as having diminished the nations safety.Just how do articles of impeachment figure in National Security?
17 posted on
08/14/2006 9:37:50 PM PDT by
cardinal4
(America, despite the usual suspects, stands firmly with Israel..)
To: JohnLongIsland
The Democrat slogan for 2006 - "Infidels, trust us to see to your security"
18 posted on
08/14/2006 9:42:21 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: JohnLongIsland
The NY Slimes wishing the Democrats could use security in the fall against the GOP.
How many times will the GOP show the Rats baosting about killing the Patriot Act? They better since they are sitting on a huge war chest. If they don't they are the stupid party.
19 posted on
08/14/2006 9:45:17 PM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: JohnLongIsland
So they expect to lose again. First sign of realism I've seen from them in years.
20 posted on
08/14/2006 9:53:48 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: JohnLongIsland
The Democrats...pissing on our leg again while telling us it is only raining.
21 posted on
08/14/2006 10:00:23 PM PDT by
Apercu
("Res ipsa loquitur")
To: JohnLongIsland
Democrats See Security as Key Issue for FallI just bet they do!!! They are currently trying to figure out the best way to convince Americans that they really do give a 'hit. It won't work. They are soft on crime, soft on terror, and soft on homeland security.
23 posted on
08/14/2006 10:28:59 PM PDT by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: JohnLongIsland
So the Dems are going to claim that if Saddam and Sons were back in power, we would be safer?
LOL
To: JohnLongIsland
The dems have done everything possible to block President Bush and our Intel agencies from doing their jobs
Even threatening to impeach the President in a time of war
It will be a cold day in hell before I ever consider the Dems are taking this WOT seriously
They think it's all a political game
26 posted on
08/14/2006 10:36:52 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: JohnLongIsland
They're the ones opposed to electronic eaves-dropping, would like to gut the NSA and leak every military/intel thing they know but Bush is the one who's "diminished the nation's safety"?
Dims see Security as Key Issue for Fall ... so do we.
29 posted on
08/14/2006 10:50:06 PM PDT by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson