Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimtorr
You get into the earlier age of Anglo-Saxon rule & from time to time a Bretwella (sp) was elected. There's no definitive starting date for the "Kingdom of England". If you wanna say that Alfred the Great was the King of the nation of England, I won't argue. Alfred was a younger son & his older brother left sons to inherit... Some laws are made to be broken, no? A claim has been made that the older brother's line continued unbroken down to Godwine, which is where Harald II's claim came from.

The time of Æthelred "the Unready" makes the whole Kingdom question less clear, with Sweyn ruling for a few weeks in the middle of his reign, though I guess the same argument could be made during times of post Norman conquest English civil wars.

Welsh law was very probably incorporated into English-Mercian law in the Midland region near Wales,

True. While I don't want to wander off into speculation about King Arthur, it is possible Welsh/British law is much stronger than my earlier statement gave credit.

70 posted on 09/17/2006 9:34:50 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: GoLightly

Why on earth would you venture off into speculation about King Arthur when you're talking about the sources of English law?


72 posted on 09/18/2006 3:10:58 PM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson