finally. Too bad Paulson you leftist (oh and your lawyer too).............
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Sub-Driver
2 posted on
08/14/2006 4:46:06 PM PDT by
pissant
To: Sub-Driver
What twists my shorts is why it even has to be moved. Don't the locals appreciate our military? Americans die protecting our country... (ending rant before I go ballistic).
4 posted on
08/14/2006 4:53:50 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
To: Sub-Driver
7 posted on
08/14/2006 4:55:41 PM PDT by
RDTF
("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
To: Sub-Driver
Just another reason to appreciate President Bush. He may not be articulate, and his smirk is a little hard to take(my deceased younger brother had the same unfortunate habit), but I love that guy, just as I loved my brother.
8 posted on
08/14/2006 4:56:13 PM PDT by
billhilly
To: Sub-Driver
But the legal fight that began in 1989 when atheist Philip Paulson sued San Diego over the cross is not played out yet. Paulson's attorney, Jim McElroy, said he filed papers in federal court in San Diego last week to void the transfer and declare it unconstitutional.
I think it is unconstitutional that ONE individual can find ONE tyrannical judge to agree with him and negate the rule of the elected leaders of the country, the other 299+ million citizens and 52 years of precedent.
9 posted on
08/14/2006 5:06:49 PM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: Jay777; Oshkalaboomboom; South40; NormsRevenge; radar101; TheDon; Coleus; weegee; bmwcyle; ...
10 posted on
08/14/2006 5:11:02 PM PDT by
RDTF
("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
To: Sub-Driver
Paulson, a Vietnam War veteran, contends that the cross, dedicated in 1954 in honor of Korean War veterans, excludes veterans who are not Christian. And no cross excludes us Christians.
To: Sub-Driver
Philip Paulson attempt to force the federal courts and the US government into deciding that this particular device is an authentic religious element violates my constitutional rights.
The government must act to protect me by putting Paulson where he can't harm me.
12 posted on
08/14/2006 5:15:50 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: AnnaZ
13 posted on
08/14/2006 5:18:25 PM PDT by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: Sub-Driver
It's stuff like this that makes me feel a bit more understanding towards terrorists. If a similar situation were to arise in Iraq the attorney who keeps taking this to court would just disappear. If another lawyer took up the case, he's go bye-bye too. Eventually no lawyer would go near the case.
But we're too civilized for that sort of thing so we'll just keep going back to court to defend a losing cause.
Where's Lee Harvey Oswald now that we REALLY need him?
19 posted on
08/14/2006 5:35:40 PM PDT by
oldfart
(The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
To: Sub-Driver
To ACLU: Up yours! Go back to the Soviet Union, this is a Judeo/Christian country!!!!
To: Sub-Driver
My thoughts on Philip Paulson, Jim McElroy, the ACLU and other socialist scumbags:
27 posted on
08/14/2006 7:04:05 PM PDT by
Outland
(Sustainable Horse Puckey)
To: Sub-Driver
True victory would be for the cross to remain where it is without need for any Federal action.
28 posted on
08/14/2006 7:23:33 PM PDT by
keats5
(tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
To: Sub-Driver
A great win against the ACLU!
29 posted on
08/14/2006 7:29:39 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(The peace of slow poison offers no comfort to those who are left burying the dead.)
To: Sub-Driver
Roger Hedgecock talked about this the other day. The memorial honors his father, among other decorated veterans.
To: Sub-Driver
Paulson, a Vietnam War veteran, contends that the cross, dedicated in 1954 in honor of Korean War veterans, excludes veterans who are not Christian. The cross never excludes anyone, but anyone can exclude the cross...
35 posted on
08/14/2006 9:47:39 PM PDT by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Sub-Driver
This should've happened years and years ago. All along there have been crazy courts, judges always moving goal posts, lilly-livered politicians, multiple thwartings of the will of the voter... it's been a study in what's *wrong* with gov't.
Am glad this happened.
36 posted on
08/14/2006 11:58:20 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace higher taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
To: Sub-Driver
After two decades, the Left is still frustrated they haven't torn down the hated cross. How that must stick in their craw!
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
37 posted on
08/15/2006 12:01:46 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Sub-Driver
I have the feeling the cross will still be there long after Shrill Phil has gone to his just reward.
38 posted on
08/15/2006 12:33:07 AM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: Sub-Driver
40 posted on
08/15/2006 5:10:54 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson