Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Democrats steal the security issue? [charge that the Democrats are national-security sissies...]
philly.com ^

Posted on 08/14/2006 10:53:10 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Can Democrats steal the security issue?

Dick Polman NATIONAL POLITICAL ANALYST

Stung by incessant bad news from Iraq, and mindful that a restive electorate might sink the congressional GOP in November, the Bush administration and its political lieutenants are trying to recoup by reviving their old charge that the Democrats are national-security sissies who should not be trusted with power.

Republicans cite the defeat in Connecticut of hawkish Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman, who fell last Tuesday in a party primary to Iraq critic Ned Lamont. Vice President Cheney says Lieberman's defeat is proof that Democrats are soft on "al-Qaeda types." GOP chairman Ken Mehlman says Democrats have adopted an "isolationist, defeatist, blame-America-first philosophy."

And Republican strategists believe that the foiled terrorist plot in Britain will buttress their political argument, and convince wavering voters that, at this critical hour, President Bush's party is more credible on the issue of keeping us safe. Bush spokesman Tony Snow contended the other day that Democrats on the "extreme left" are waving "a white flag in the war on terror."

But will this traditional GOP message, which worked so well in 2002 and 2004, pack the same punch in 2006?

Skepticism is warranted.

John Zogby, the independent pollster who closely tracks public opinion on Bush and the Iraq war, said Friday: "The old Republican charge still has some traction, and, frankly, it's maybe the one ace in the hole that Republicans potentially have this year. But the public's mood has changed a lot since 2002 and 2004, and that's why attacking the Democrats that way could be very, very risky."

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; issues; nationalsecurity

1 posted on 08/14/2006 10:53:12 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
But will this traditional GOP message, which worked so well in 2002 and 2004, pack the same punch in 2006? Skepticism is warranted.

The Dems just booted their one surviving hawk, Joe Lieberman. Yet this pinhead thinks national security won't work for the GOP in 2006? I wonder why?

John Zogby

Ah, he's been swilling the Zogby special sauce. No wonder.

2 posted on 08/14/2006 10:57:23 AM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

...nuff said

3 posted on 08/14/2006 10:57:41 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...8th TFW...Ubon Thailand...408thMMS..."69"...Night Line Delivery...AMMO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Can Democrats steal the security issue? [charge that the Democrats are national-security sissies...] NO

"John Zogby, the independent pollster.... "
Calling zombie the "independent pollster..." disqualifies the writer as a serious person.


4 posted on 08/14/2006 11:06:11 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hillary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Joe Lieberman will win in the fall by a landslide. The democraps will try and spin it but they will loose.
The dems just can't get it through their heads that they do not elect people all by themselves.
They seem to have the stupid opinion that just because a dem wins the "democratic primary" that they have won the election. When this doesn't come true then they start yelling about the unfair election.
5 posted on 08/14/2006 11:11:54 AM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
why attacking the Democrats that way could be very, very risky."

Oh, I get it! Don't say anything about the Democraps and their indifference to national security, otherwise you will be very very sorry. Because nobody will believe it and theyll think Republicans are scum. And this writer is looking out for Republican interests, of course. Very empathetic fellow.

6 posted on 08/14/2006 11:23:56 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Ah, he's been swilling the Zogby special sauce. No wonder.


7 posted on 08/14/2006 11:26:59 AM PDT by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The RATS seem to be trying but events are overtaking them. Like Bush security approval rating going up 11 points to 55%.


8 posted on 08/14/2006 11:38:50 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (I'll have the duck with mango salsa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I was not a sissy, before I became one and voted for the war before I voted against it.

/Sarcasm off

9 posted on 08/14/2006 11:43:36 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Dean Finds Timing of Terrorist Plot Suspicious

Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee has assailed the “poor timing” of the recently thwarted al-Qaeda plot to blow up multiple trans-Atlantic flights from the United Kingdom to the United States. “We had the Republicans on the ropes,” Dean complained. “All the polls showed us picking up dozens of seats in Congress—enough to take back the majority and ensure the impeachment of President Bush, now this. Are these terrorists idiots? Couldn’t they wait until after November?”

Dean didn’t confine his wrath to what he dubbed “those bumbling Muslim nincompoops.” He offered an alternative take on events that was more conspiratorial in nature. “How do we know it’s not a put up job?” Dean mused. “It’s easy to arrest people and claim they were going to launch an attack. Maybe there was no planned attack.”

Dean asserted that the “trigger-happy duo” of Bush and Blair—the “killer Bs” as he called them—were, at best, escalating the violence against the U.S. and U.K. “These two act as if a ‘pluralistic society’ is the only acceptable way to govern,” Dean said. “Bush and Blair are risking our lives by foolishly espousing an abstract concept of liberty. Well, every suicide attack against us is a powerful vote for a different culture of governance. We need to take heed of these votes instead of blindly lashing out at this different point of view. The belligerence of Bush and Blair is escalating the conflict.”

Dean said he still remains hopeful that memories of the “alleged” narrow escape from this latest terrorist attack will fade by November. “Football season will be starting, there’ll be the World Series, a new TV season—plenty of things to distract voters from the alleged success of Bush’s war on terror,” Dean said. “I’m confident our ‘u-turn for America’ theme will convince a majority to place their trust in our party.”

In related news, the ACLU expressed dismay that a key tactic in the U.K.’s foiling of the plot to blow up airliners was a so-called “sneak-and-peek” program where British intelligence experts covertly broke into suspects homes and implanted listening devices. “This was an outrageous trampling of civil rights,” said ACLU spokesman, Bertram Petty. “Some may find comfort in the lives saved, but we see a greater danger in the privacy lost. We must do everything we can to ensure that this kind of intrusion doesn’t happen here.”

read more...

http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm



10 posted on 08/14/2006 11:44:35 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The WOT is not political

These terrorists want to kill dems, indy, pubbies and anyone else who don't bend to their will

When will people realise this


11 posted on 08/14/2006 11:46:42 AM PDT by Mo1 (Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Kerry by 310": Zogby, eve of election 2004.


12 posted on 08/14/2006 11:47:39 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson