Posted on 08/14/2006 10:53:10 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Can Democrats steal the security issue?
Dick Polman NATIONAL POLITICAL ANALYST
Stung by incessant bad news from Iraq, and mindful that a restive electorate might sink the congressional GOP in November, the Bush administration and its political lieutenants are trying to recoup by reviving their old charge that the Democrats are national-security sissies who should not be trusted with power.
Republicans cite the defeat in Connecticut of hawkish Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman, who fell last Tuesday in a party primary to Iraq critic Ned Lamont. Vice President Cheney says Lieberman's defeat is proof that Democrats are soft on "al-Qaeda types." GOP chairman Ken Mehlman says Democrats have adopted an "isolationist, defeatist, blame-America-first philosophy."
And Republican strategists believe that the foiled terrorist plot in Britain will buttress their political argument, and convince wavering voters that, at this critical hour, President Bush's party is more credible on the issue of keeping us safe. Bush spokesman Tony Snow contended the other day that Democrats on the "extreme left" are waving "a white flag in the war on terror."
But will this traditional GOP message, which worked so well in 2002 and 2004, pack the same punch in 2006?
Skepticism is warranted.
John Zogby, the independent pollster who closely tracks public opinion on Bush and the Iraq war, said Friday: "The old Republican charge still has some traction, and, frankly, it's maybe the one ace in the hole that Republicans potentially have this year. But the public's mood has changed a lot since 2002 and 2004, and that's why attacking the Democrats that way could be very, very risky."
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
The Dems just booted their one surviving hawk, Joe Lieberman. Yet this pinhead thinks national security won't work for the GOP in 2006? I wonder why?
John Zogby
Ah, he's been swilling the Zogby special sauce. No wonder.
...nuff said
Can Democrats steal the security issue? [charge that the Democrats are national-security sissies...] NO
"John Zogby, the independent pollster.... "
Calling zombie the "independent pollster..." disqualifies the writer as a serious person.
Oh, I get it! Don't say anything about the Democraps and their indifference to national security, otherwise you will be very very sorry. Because nobody will believe it and theyll think Republicans are scum. And this writer is looking out for Republican interests, of course. Very empathetic fellow.
The RATS seem to be trying but events are overtaking them. Like Bush security approval rating going up 11 points to 55%.
I was not a sissy, before I became one and voted for the war before I voted against it.
/Sarcasm off
Dean Finds Timing of Terrorist Plot Suspicious
Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee has assailed the poor timing of the recently thwarted al-Qaeda plot to blow up multiple trans-Atlantic flights from the United Kingdom to the United States. We had the Republicans on the ropes, Dean complained. All the polls showed us picking up dozens of seats in Congressenough to take back the majority and ensure the impeachment of President Bush, now this. Are these terrorists idiots? Couldnt they wait until after November?
Dean didnt confine his wrath to what he dubbed those bumbling Muslim nincompoops. He offered an alternative take on events that was more conspiratorial in nature. How do we know its not a put up job? Dean mused. Its easy to arrest people and claim they were going to launch an attack. Maybe there was no planned attack.
Dean asserted that the trigger-happy duo of Bush and Blairthe killer Bs as he called themwere, at best, escalating the violence against the U.S. and U.K. These two act as if a pluralistic society is the only acceptable way to govern, Dean said. Bush and Blair are risking our lives by foolishly espousing an abstract concept of liberty. Well, every suicide attack against us is a powerful vote for a different culture of governance. We need to take heed of these votes instead of blindly lashing out at this different point of view. The belligerence of Bush and Blair is escalating the conflict.
Dean said he still remains hopeful that memories of the alleged narrow escape from this latest terrorist attack will fade by November. Football season will be starting, therell be the World Series, a new TV seasonplenty of things to distract voters from the alleged success of Bushs war on terror, Dean said. Im confident our u-turn for America theme will convince a majority to place their trust in our party.
In related news, the ACLU expressed dismay that a key tactic in the U.K.s foiling of the plot to blow up airliners was a so-called sneak-and-peek program where British intelligence experts covertly broke into suspects homes and implanted listening devices. This was an outrageous trampling of civil rights, said ACLU spokesman, Bertram Petty. Some may find comfort in the lives saved, but we see a greater danger in the privacy lost. We must do everything we can to ensure that this kind of intrusion doesnt happen here.
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
The WOT is not political
These terrorists want to kill dems, indy, pubbies and anyone else who don't bend to their will
When will people realise this
"Kerry by 310": Zogby, eve of election 2004.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.