Skip to comments.
Netanyahu: There will be another round in this war
Jerusalem Post ^
| 8/14/6
| JPost.com staff
Posted on 08/14/2006 8:11:06 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
1
posted on
08/14/2006 8:11:07 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
I suspect the Israelis are backing away to regroup and rethink their military strategy.
They know that Hezbellah (sp?) will break the cease fire - they are using this opportunity to put together a new aggressive military plan.
The command at the begining of this last round was not entirely together on how to attack.
Call this period a state of reorganization.
It won't last long I suspect.
To: SmithL
All of which is true. Israel secured a truce - not a peace agreement. There will be a next round. The only question is whether Israel will be ready for it.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
3
posted on
08/14/2006 8:14:48 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Jake The Goose
I agree and in the interim the opposition led by Bibi should call for an election so Olmert can get voted out.
4
posted on
08/14/2006 8:15:39 AM PDT
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: SmithL
Of course if Netanyahu had become prime minister this spring the war would probably have been over a few weeks ago.
5
posted on
08/14/2006 8:15:48 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: SmithL
Olmert = Chamberlain
Netanyahu = Churchill
6
posted on
08/14/2006 8:16:13 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Jake The Goose
There's a lot of people in Israel questioning Olmert and his ability to get the job done. There will be a battle on another day but it may not be Olmert calling the shots. Go Bibi!
7
posted on
08/14/2006 8:17:53 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: SmithL
What Bibi just said was what I almost responded to your other thread with. I figure it's better he say it. Now, if I were Israeli, I'd vote for him right now. All I can do is applaud his clear-sightedness and Churchillian stature.
Go, Bibi.
8
posted on
08/14/2006 8:19:40 AM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(www.stjosephssanford.org)
To: goldstategop
a softening for Aug 21???
To: wagglebee
if it weren't over, it would have been more focussed towards a tangible victory. seems to me Ohlmert had an "exit" plan, but forgot to win which nixed a successful exit.
10
posted on
08/14/2006 8:20:49 AM PDT
by
avital2
To: SmithL
I hope Bibi is running the show for the next round.
11
posted on
08/14/2006 8:21:23 AM PDT
by
308MBR
( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
To: goldstategop; Jake The Goose
Round Two will commence soon I think. Will it mean rocket attacks on Tel Aviv?
I don't understand why the IDF waited so long to commence the ground portion of the operation. I think they must have been surpirsed by the extensiveness and depth of the Hezbollah defenses and armaments. And Olmert didn't show the dynamic leadership required.
12
posted on
08/14/2006 8:22:05 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: SmithL
13
posted on
08/14/2006 8:23:45 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling, but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.)
To: SmithL
Why on earth anyone on the Israeli side considered this a good deal is beyond me. I have to assume that due to a lack of forcefulness on Olmert's part the Israeli's figured most of the easy gains had already been won. Hopefully in round two Israel will have someone at the helm who will act much more decisively on the ground once the IAF has done the initial work.
To: Rummyfan
Some commentators were saying they were held back by politics in Israel. Apparently some wanted the same kind of "war" Clinton tended to wage. I have no idea if this is true: hearing it on teevee doesn't make it so. However, if it is, it's another example of PC-ism and the damage it does. (Take note, Pentagon!)
15
posted on
08/14/2006 8:24:55 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: dfwgator
There's one big difference. Chamberlain had the good sense to step aside after Germany invaded Poland and let Churchill take over. Olmert's trying to sell this fiasco as a great victory and will have to be driven out of office.
To: SmithL
Anyone ever consider that as part of surrendering "Land for Peace" Israel was pushed to the brink of civil war and that in anticipation of segments of the military refusing to obey orders to remove settlers, certain NCO's, junior oficers and even senior officers were pre-emptively replaced with "Yes Men"?
It's not so much Olmerts fault as it is a reflection of designed incompetence within the officer corp's and NCO's of the IDF?
17
posted on
08/14/2006 8:28:41 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: Rummyfan
The IDF waited because Olmert forced it to wait. They had a plan to destroy Hezbollah in the first couple of days of the war and Olmert refused to allow them to implement it.
To: Jake The Goose
I suspect the Israelis are backing away to regroup and rethink their military strategy.
The strategy that needs to be assessed is the strategy of not firing on the "civilians" that hide the fighters.
When fighters fire on Israeli soldiers while hiding in a town full of civilians -- level the town with artillery. The Israelis will only have to do this a few times before civilians run away when the Israelis appear, leaving only the fighters.
Sort of like ... the era of airplane hijacking is over. Any attempts at hijacking will now be met with "civilians" taking casualties to overcome and beat the hijackers to death.
To: Jake The Goose
They know that Hezbellah (sp?)... I just call 'em "Hezbos" - saves a lot of typing, too...
20
posted on
08/14/2006 8:30:02 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson