Skip to comments.
Original moon landing film lost
London Daily Telegraph via The Washington Times ^
| August 14, 2006
| Robert Colvile
Posted on 08/13/2006 10:31:14 PM PDT by seacapn
The original film footage of astronaut Neil Armstrong's first steps on the moon, one of the most important artifacts of the 20th century, has been lost.
The television broadcast seen by about 600 million people in July 1969 is preserved for posterity, but the original tapes from which the footage was taken have been mislaid, most likely in NASA's vast archives at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
The footage could transform our view of the moon landings, offering images far sharper than the blurred, grainy video shown around the world. It also could lay to rest the conspiracy theory that the landings were faked on a Hollywood soundstage.
Despite its iconic status, the television footage was the equivalent of a photocopy of a photocopy. It came from a camera that had been pointed at a black-and-white monitor on Earth. The image on the monitor, in turn, had been stripped of much of its detail.
To make sure the transmission would make it back to Earth, the images sent from Apollo 11 were recorded at 10 frames per second, and had to be converted to 60 frames per second in order to be broadcast. In the process, much of the detail was lost.
Stan Lebar, now 81, was in charge of the images from Apollo 11. What he saw was so blurred that he initially thought something had gone wrong.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: apollo11; artbell; conspiracy; film; gramsci; incompetence; missing; moonlanding; nasa; preservation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: CindyDawg
Authenticity to be determined by the presence or absence of serifs on the letters in the closed captioning.
41
posted on
08/13/2006 11:43:55 PM PDT
by
Lexinom
To: spinestein
Why would anyone disbelieve the moon landings? I wasn't alive at the time. HOWEVER, I have seen - twice, in person - the 747 with the shuttle on top fly over: once over my school in Seabrook, Texas, and once over my house in Burlington, Washington, in 1986.
If we have a real shuttle that can launch into orbit, with all the complexity that entails, why could we not send a man to the moon?
42
posted on
08/13/2006 11:50:04 PM PDT
by
Lexinom
To: burzum
43
posted on
08/14/2006 12:09:35 AM PDT
by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule)
To: Lexinom
To be fair, the technology of the space shuttle (my dad worked on the prototype Enterprise) is leaps and bounds beyond that which we used to get to the moon. Did you ever see Apollo 13? It's accurate, they practically had to graph their descent path, write all their variables down and solve for X. It was analog space travel, like using an abacus instead of a calculator.
The technology was prehistoric but I don't doubt that we went there. You can't keep a secret that big for this long, especially considering the amount of people that would been involved in such a staging. It's common sense, the same thing I personally use to debunk all those retarded 9/11 conspiracy theories [tangent] - do you mean to tell me that the government (or someone else?) had all those poor people on the planes taken from the airport, put in a room, told to call their loved ones and say that terrorists had hijacked their plane, and then had them simply disappear? And what of the hijackers? How were they (or someone else) forced to fly airplanes into buildings? Could any sane individual REALLY believe that someone in the government would kill 3,000 people and go through all this trouble... for what? To start a prolonged war on unfamiliar soil, any possible economic benefits of which would be crushed by the costs of the war itself?
Wait, haven't libs always been saying that Pres. Bush is stupid and childish? But other libs think he's an evil, diabolical mastermind? Which is it?[/tangent]
Back to the topic at hand, I find it stunning that someone so irresponsible could be entrusted to keep track of something so important. I hope this gets found someday, it would be a real damn shame if it's still sitting in some basement by the time The Man Upstairs starts His comeback tour...
44
posted on
08/14/2006 12:13:40 AM PDT
by
Zeon Cowboy
("We must all fear evil men, but there is another kind of evil which we should fear most...")
To: Lexinom
The technology needed to put a payload into orbit has been around since Sputnik. THAT was no hoax. The engineering behind rocketry has enjoyed an undeserved reputation for being at the limit of human capability, but to tell the truth, rocket science ain't really rocket science.
Building the container to keep astronauts alive in while in space is also easier than it's popular image. It just took a whole lot of money, time and manpower to build the necessary infrastructure for the program, and then to build the vehicles themselves, and finally test them and refine them to make sure they would continue to work properly in spite of their complexity.
Within the next few years it looks as if there will be private space vehicles actually transporting people into orbit, and when that becomes commonplace the people who claimed that traveling to the moon is fiction are going to look silly.
45
posted on
08/14/2006 12:24:38 AM PDT
by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule)
To: Zeon Cowboy
[I find it stunning that someone so irresponsible could be entrusted to keep track of something so important.]
Really there are only two LIKELY possibilities:
1) It was misfiled and will turn up on a different shelf during a thorough search
2) It was pilfered by an insider and it will turn up at some point in the future after the person who took it can't be in jeopardy for theft anymore
The Apollo moon landing is arguably the greatest single event achievement of humanity to date and the original film of its happening would be a profound loss.
46
posted on
08/14/2006 12:35:04 AM PDT
by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule)
To: pillut48
Put your hands above your head and back slowly away from the keyboard!
47
posted on
08/14/2006 12:38:26 AM PDT
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(WARNING: Alcohol may cause you to think you are whispering when you are definitely not.)
To: spinestein
Here is another take on the tapes that tends to agree with your #1.
48
posted on
08/14/2006 12:47:01 AM PDT
by
cabojoe
To: BJungNan
I would like to offer you some advice.
go dig up those old tapes/reels, find a place that will convert them onto CD, and then you can ged rid of them. We had some 8mm tape from around 1980 of me playing soccer with friends etc....and today it's gone...FOREVER
I recently took several old VCR tapes of family reunions, birthday parties etc.... and had them converted to DVD for $20 each. the quality is fine and now I dont care if the tapes get lost.
To everyone out there that has all there old vacations from the 80's on vcr tape sitting in the basement, do yourself a favor and get them transferred to a CD or other modern median.
It's YOUR history.
49
posted on
08/14/2006 1:00:19 AM PDT
by
Jaysin
To: BJungNan
I would like to offer you some advice.
go dig up those old tapes/reels, find a place that will convert them onto CD, and then you can ged rid of them. We had some 8mm tape from around 1980 of me playing soccer with friends etc....and today it's gone...FOREVER
I recently took several old VCR tapes of family reunions, birthday parties etc.... and had them converted to DVD for $20 each. the quality is fine and now I dont care if the tapes get lost.
To everyone out there that has all there old vacations from the 80's on vcr tape sitting in the basement, do yourself a favor and get them transferred to a CD or other modern median.
It's YOUR history.
50
posted on
08/14/2006 1:00:21 AM PDT
by
Jaysin
To: spinestein
Armstrong has a well deserved reputation for being a very uninteresting interview,Yeah interview. One in 30 years and it stunk. CBS played the interview just like they played the public with Cronkite doing the feeding.
To: sonic109
Yeah right. There is more evidence against it then there is for it.
To: supercat
Man-made artifacts, especially corner reflector arrays, are detectable at the claimed landing sites. And the proof of this is...?
To: seacapn
We have our top people working on it...TOP PEOPLE.
54
posted on
08/14/2006 1:59:43 AM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: taxesareforever
Try googling "corner reflector arrays moon". If you still have doubts, I'm sure you can contact some of the researchers that are still firing lasers at the reflectors on the moon.
55
posted on
08/14/2006 2:02:26 AM PDT
by
cabojoe
To: cabojoe
You're wasting your time. He already knows "the truth" and nothing will convince him otherwise.
All the money "supposedly" spent on the manned space program has actually been allocated for mind control technology as directed by the Bilderbergs.
56
posted on
08/14/2006 2:25:10 AM PDT
by
MadJack
("Today is the first day of the rest of your miserable existence. Suck it up, loser.")
To: seacapn
I was fortunate enough back in the mid eighties to have business dealings with a former astronaut. Stu "Rusty" Roosa, command module pilot on Apollo 14, along with his wife and my friend had dinner one night at a great little resturant in Biloxi, MS. One of the most captivating conversations that I have ever had; with one of those guys that had the most lonely job out of this world. Command Module Pilots stayed aboard while the other two went down to the moon's surface, thus being out of radio range for periods of time, while behind the moon. I think 14 was the mission Shepard hit the golf balls on the moon. Funny how a lot of those guys ended up in the beer business.
To: seacapn
The television broadcast seen by about 600 million people in July 1969 is preserved for posterity, but the original tapes from which the footage was taken have been mislaid, most likely in NASA's vast archives at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
NASA losing something.
Gee, what a surprise.
58
posted on
08/14/2006 4:18:15 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Lancey Howard
Graham: Swing away, Merrill.
Merrill: Huh?
Graham: Merrill, swing away.
59
posted on
08/14/2006 5:12:40 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: seacapn
There's no question about it. Large bureucracies are mindless. How much confirmation do we really need?
What good are national "archives" if they don't even have enough sense to define "importance" and "priorities" for the national historical record?
60
posted on
08/14/2006 6:00:19 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson