Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John123
As an interesting side note,the predecessor of the Democratic Party was the Whigs who were in favor of slavery...

Nope the Whigs were the predecessors of the Republican Party (mostly) and their opponents were the Democrat Party founded by Jackson.

It was anti-slavery for the most part and that "for the most part" was what brought it down. The party split on whether slavery should be allowed to expand in the US or not.

25 posted on 08/13/2006 3:53:27 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Nope the Whigs were the predecessors of the Republican Party (mostly) and their opponents were the Democrat Party founded by Jackson.

Thank you for the correction. The point is -- and I do have a point -- is that the Jacksonian Democrats were in favor of slavery.

And I think you know where I am going with this... At what point did the Democrats become the party of choice for the minorities? And the party of Lincoln (the Republicans) become the suppressor?

31 posted on 08/13/2006 4:08:53 PM PDT by John123 (Boy ... I'm gonna miss the cutest little jihaddist in Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson