Skip to comments.
Antiwar Wackadoos Are Winning
Los Angeles Times ^
| August 11, 2006
Posted on 08/12/2006 8:22:50 AM PDT by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
08/12/2006 8:22:51 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
These columnists live in their own minds. They're heroes there.
2
posted on
08/12/2006 8:27:08 AM PDT
by
Vision
(“I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me" Philippians 3:14)
To: A. Pole
The antiwar crowd is accomplishing the same thing they've always accomplished. They're ending exactly zero wars and extending all wars and getting more people killed than any decisive victory ever could.
3
posted on
08/12/2006 8:27:37 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: A. Pole
Antiwar Wackadoos Are Winning Oh really? See you in November.
4
posted on
08/12/2006 8:28:17 AM PDT
by
badpacifist
(Democrats......deers caught in the headlights of terrorism.)
To: A. Pole
First thing we do is stop calling them wackadoos... they are sympathizers, if not the enemy themselves...
President Bush, Aug 12, 2006: "I ask for your patience, cooperation, and vigilance in the coming days."
To: A. Pole
I hope the LA Times has reporters covering Sen. Joe Lieberman's victory speech and Ned Lamont's concession speech in November.
6
posted on
08/12/2006 8:33:54 AM PDT
by
hflynn
( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
To: badpacifist
7
posted on
08/12/2006 8:34:48 AM PDT
by
fanfan
(The MSM has no clothes.)
To: A. Pole
Antiwar Wackadoos Are
Winning
Whinning
Now the title is correct. ;-)
8
posted on
08/12/2006 8:35:29 AM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: A. Pole
The Liberals are like Hebollah... While no one was watching.. They built up their Weapons (MSM propaganda, ACLU, NAACP, NOW, etc.).. They infiltrated those who sympathize with them (the Democrat party)... They deny their true agenda (socialism/Communism).
9
posted on
08/12/2006 8:39:00 AM PDT
by
divine_moment_of_facts
("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
To: divine_moment_of_facts
It is time to push them out of the way. Dems are going to get us killed! Iran is just waiting for them to come to power, Dems put the mullahs in power. Carter is the original idiot!
To: A. Pole
It used to be possible to adopt an antiwar platform and be left entirely alone by most mainstream Americans. Sure, you'd be sneered at by the media, ostracized by the major political parties and, from time to time, your in-laws would accuse you of living on the radical fringe.Huh???!!!???
"Sneered at by the media?" What planet is this guy from? Since the early 1970s, "the media" have been incredible supporters of the "peace movement," as long as the war being fought is in the interest of the US. Interestingly enough, they don't seem to mind the US fighting wars that aren't in the national interest...
But even during dem administrations, the media has been at least mildly "anti-war." Of course, as soon as you get to a republican administration, the caterwalling of the media against the wars have been deafening!
Mark
11
posted on
08/12/2006 8:44:14 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: PROTESTBYPROXY
So true... They are Busted in more ways than one.
12
posted on
08/12/2006 8:48:22 AM PDT
by
divine_moment_of_facts
("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
To: A. Pole
What happened was just that the whole democracy thing worked just the way it's supposed to, for once. A majority of citizens oppose the war in Iraq, so they went to the polls and voted for the guy who shares their views, instead of the guy who doesn't. Um... no. A majority of the Democrats who went to the polls voted for the guy who shares their views. That doesn't mean a majority of citizens, as a whole, agree with him.
13
posted on
08/12/2006 8:57:53 AM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
("I'm not a hawk or a dove. I just don't want my country to be a pigeon." -- Henry "Scoop" Jackson)
To: A. Pole
Opposing the war in Iraq isn't fringe anymore it's become part of what defines ordinary Americans. You'd think they'd wait till they wone just *one* single election, before crowing. Wouldn'tcha?
Winning a party primary. Big whoop. Dukakis won a bunch of them!
I've got my eye on this election cycle. If they win in just one single general election, I may change my opinion of them. But for now, they still are "the fringe".
Just like, and let's face it, we here on FR are 'the fringe'. Typically, a FReeper is politically active, tech-savy, educated beyond the average, and enjoys spirited debate on the issues.
All of which allows us to use this fabulous tool FR to magnify our voices to a scream.
14
posted on
08/12/2006 9:06:09 AM PDT
by
Dominic Harr
(Conservative = Careful, as in 'Conservative with money')
To: Celtjew Libertarian
In the case of primary elections, a small percentage of the voters vote for the guy who shares their view
15
posted on
08/12/2006 9:08:26 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: cripplecreek
Your post was right bon the mark. My question is why the antiwar fools are never held accountable? Do the ever feel any responsibility for their actions? And, it`s not like they don`t know, because, since Vietnam, our enemies have announced that their strategy was to prolong the conflict till we gave up and went home.
16
posted on
08/12/2006 9:10:55 AM PDT
by
bybybill
(`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
To: badpacifist
I, for one, eagerly look forward to November when the anti-war whackos will discover they are just a figment of their own imaginations.
All pacifism has ever accomplished is more deaths and longer wars.
Kumbaya does not translate well into the language of terrorists
To: A. Pole
>Antiwar Wackadoos Are Winning<
Whew, for a moment there, I thought Georgia voters tossed her out.
18
posted on
08/12/2006 9:24:32 AM PDT
by
Darnright
(http://www.irey.com/)
To: A. Pole
The media has tried to show them as winning all along, with exaggerated numbers and distorted reporting.
19
posted on
08/12/2006 10:26:19 AM PDT
by
BonnieJ
To: Dominic Harr
Past elections were won by a small margin. What keeps Republicans in power is a strange infatuation of Democrats with "gay marriage", abortion, stem cells research, Celebration of Diversity in public schools, suppression of religion in public sphere etc etc.
The New Deal style Democrats with some traditional moral values would win one landslide after another as they used to in the past.
20
posted on
08/12/2006 6:48:39 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Gay marriage" - Karl Rove's conspiracy to defeat Democrats?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson