[Puppage]

Lamont spokesman Liz Dupont-Diehl says that while Lieberman accuses people who challenge the Bush administration of being weak on security, Lieberman's support of President Bush's foreign policies has made America and the Middle East less safe.

Of course, in typical rat fashion, they offer NO explaination why that is.

[southernnorthcarolina]

[avacado]

"Lamont told The New York Times..."

Already getting cozy with the Traitor Times!

[Izzy Dunne]

Lieberman's support of President Bush's foreign policies has made America and the Middle East less safe.

Did history books re-boot on Jan. 20, 2001?

[Darkwolf377]

Looks like Lamont is going to self-destruct faster than I thought. I agree with the anti-war fools--this guy should be heard loud and clear, as often as possible.

[MNJohnnie]

Latest Lib Talking Point. They say this all over and of course NONE of our Junk Media types do anything but mindlessly repeat it. Gee could SOMEONE ask even ONE of the Democrat stooges how it has made us "less safe"? Comparing the last 5 years post 9-11 with the 5 years leading UP to 9-11 we see vastly more success at protecting the USA under Bush then with Clinton.

We have arrested or killed FAR more terrorists, disrupted or prevent far more attacks and suffered far fewer successful attacks under Bush then we did under Clinton. Based on a straight up analysis of the Data the Democrats are prove liars.

[magslinger]

This Dhim vs Dhim race is going to be a mudslinging campaign of epic proportions. I realize that the Republican is currently in the single digits, but he shouldn't be counted out yet. He may be the last man standing.

[AndyJackson]

people who challenge the Bush administration of being weak on security

Orwell... Orwell..... Cleanup on aisle 3.

[Edit35]

Lamont thinks that battling terrorists makes us 'unsafe' ... and that sitting idly by while the terrorists hatch plots and build up their weapon supply makes us more "safe."

[napscoordinator]

The truth hurts...

[Pox]

"has made America and the Middle East less safe"

This is the 21^st century battle cry of the anti war cowards. Always seems to me to be a last ditch attempt to justify the cowards reasons to avoid conflict/combat with the terrorists in the middle east.

Used extensively to denounce our actions in Iraq and will also be used in any lead up to our next war in the middle east.

[CFC__VRWC]

Lamont told The New York Times that Lieberman sounded a lot like Vice President Dick Cheney.

Lamont's campaign "strategy" in an nutshell. Say over and over again that Lieberman = Bush, and count on the Drive Bys to do the rest.

[xcamel]

as

Neville Lamont?

[airborne]

Lamont spokesman Liz Dupont-Diehl says...

Lieberman can speak for himself. Why can't Lamont?

[FreeRep]

Democrats' steadfast refusal to support the War on Terror is proof they've marginalized themselves as the party of Cindy Sheehan and the loony left.

[Clara Lou]

It just seems to me that Lieberman needs to leave the Democrat Party officially. He'd be a RINO, but the Democrats have shown their true colors.
My liberal-leaning friend is dismayed by what the Democrats have done to Lieberman. But, then, I think she's the same kind of centrist Democrat that Lieberman is.

[abclily]

Lamont and the Muslims think they are going to control freedom of speech in this country. Not likely!

[OldFriend]

Comment from Lamont.......terror plot, what terror plot, just President Bush playing on our fears!

/s/

[Eagles Talon IV]

You know, I'm REALLY lovin' how the hapless cut and run libs totally come unhinged at the slightest mention of anything to do with national security and their weakness in this area. They know the coming elections will be all about the safety and security of America and her people and they are desperate to change the focus. Every time a terror operation is busted up, every time a terror suspect is arrested and everytime that nut bag president of Iran, Alamabajabbadine or whatever the hell his name is, shoots off his mouth, the left cringes.

Forget the biased polling and use common sense. If there is no security, if we cannot be safe within our own borders then nothing else matters. The instinct for survival is the very strongest we possess and people will remember that when the walk into the voting booth.

[muawiyah]

This Lamont character is in the Demo-proto-islamo-fascist wing of the party that thinks the Middle East is best improved by removing Americans and Jews from the area.

Time to send him back to his investments.

[marajade]

And complete withdrawal out of Iraq will make us safer? How's that?