You seem to think that I think that keeping one's pant on is the only of measure of honor.
This is quite possibly the most illogical leap ever perpetrated on this forum, Bad. It's so far from the truth, that there's no way to even address it.
I don't. That was your leap. You assumed something that was not in evidence.
So this still doesn't answer my question, because I didn't do what you imagined me to do........
It IS however, of note to find out how you completely dismiss morality as part of the equation of conservatism. I suppose that's why you feel free to just make things up as you go in forming your 'arguments' against me. When you deliberately blur what's right and what's wrong, you do whatever you feel like doing, whether it's honest or not.
But since you have dismissed morality (don't be so naive as to assume that sex is the only thing involved in being a moral person), we really have no common ground, do we? Because it's the basis of everything I think and do, and you think it's of no value.
So.........you've made your point, and I understand it.
I believe that's all I want to say to you........ever.
(I would like to know some day, however, if beeler is your little boy, or your girlfriend. You really are attached to the troll.....)
Go back and re-read your post to me. What you are asking here is not what you said in your original post. You are the one dodging, not me.
How do you divide those two concepts in your mind? (or soul?)
You are the one assuming that I do divide them. I just said that keeping one's pants on ALONE is NOT the ONLY measure of honor.
This is quite possibly the most illogical leap ever perpetrated on this forum, Bad. It's so far from the truth, that there's no way to even address it.
It may be afield from your evolving evasion, but it is exactly on point with your original response. I think that you are spinning so much that you are confusing yourself more than you were to begin with.
So this still doesn't answer my question, because I didn't do what you imagined me to do........
Maybe not what you meant, but certainly what you typed.
It IS however, of note to find out how you completely dismiss morality as part of the equation of conservatism. I suppose that's why you feel free to just make things up as you go in forming your 'arguments' against me. When you deliberately blur what's right and what's wrong, you do whatever you feel like doing, whether it's honest or not.
Please show me where I dismissed morality? I said only that I'd rather he limit who he screws. You are the one justifying the bad acts of Republicans by encouraging their reelection despite those bad acts. Acts which range from anti gun votes, to being pro abortion, to expanding government. You advocate rewarding bad behavior, I don't. But in your mind, that's moral. That's also really rich.
But since you have dismissed morality (don't be so naive as to assume that sex is the only thing involved in being a moral person), we really have no common ground, do we? Because it's the basis of everything I think and do, and you think it's of no value.
You are one delusional woman. I am holding these pols to a higher standard than you. Why is it that you think that you own the moral high ground?
So.........you've made your point, and I understand it.
I believe that's all I want to say to you........ever.
(I would like to know some day, however, if beeler is your little boy, or your girlfriend. You really are attached to the troll.....)
You are a piece of work. Until I posted on this thread, I have never heard his or her name before. I've never seen a post of his/hers. I just didn't like the treatment that he or she was getting from a vicious pack of attack dogs of which you were part. It's not part of my nature to stand by and do nothing when someone is attacked for their opinions.