[syriacus]

Michael Moore and Michael Schiavo and Hillary Clinton support Ned Lamont even though:

A vote for Ned Lamont
is a vote for the rights of abusive men*
to kill vulnerable women and children
at home and abroad.

*(like terrorists and unfaithful husbands)

[2ndClassCitizen]

Every action has an opposite effect. Lamont winning is not necessaryily good for the moonbats.

[syriacus]

Michael Schiavo, wife starver extraordinaire, probably feels pretty good right now, because his candidate, Ned Lamont, beat Lieberman. We can probably expect to see more of Michael, if Lieberman runs as an independent.

Terri Schiavo's Brother Thanks Lieberman as Michael Campaigns for Lamont

In a 2003 interview with AP, Lieberman said he supported a decision in favor of life in cases where a patient is incapacitated and has not made known their desires about lifesaving medical treatment.

"I believe that certainly in cases where there is not a living will ... I feel very strongly that we ought to honor life and we ought not to create a system where people are being deprived of nutrition or hydration in a way that ends their lives,” Lieberman said.

... Schindler said he sought Lieberman's help when legislation was pending in the Senate to support Terri.

Saying Lieberman and other lawmakers were "trying to do the right thing," Schindler told the Hartford paper, "That's all the government said -- give her a federal review, like the people on death row. The government's role is to protect innocent life."