My I fellate you, sir?
Posted on 08/09/2006 7:32:22 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Humanizing the Iranian Hitler.
IMHO...This was all planned ahead of time, and not some spur of the moment interview as Ahmad would have Wallace believe.
It is part and parcel of Ahmadinejad's strategy to split the hearts and minds of Americans. I'm betting he's going to tell us he's a man of peace, Iran's a peaceful nation (has never attacked, etc), that nuke technology is their right, that America's track record is one of evil destruction.
He's soft spoken, gentle in delivery as it were, and he will drive our left to submission.
It's even worse than it first seemed - take a look at some more of Wallace's remarks about that interview (source: FoxNews)...
" Of Ahmadinejad, Wallace said, "He's an impressive fellow, this guy. He really is. He's obviously smart as hell."
Wallace said he was surprised to find that the Iranian president was still a college professor who taught a graduate-level course.
"You'll find him an interesting man," he said. "I expected more of a firebrand. I don't think he has the slightest doubt about how he feels ... about the American administration and the Zionist state. He comes across as more rational than I had expected." "
Wallace thinks he's rational? This is more disgusting than Sheehan shmoozing with Chavez.
The obvious comparison by Wallace is that this guy is "smart" (because all professors are brilliant), while Bush is just a dumb simpleton from Texas.
I'm sorry, I feel bad real bad. I blame it on dad, who didn't buy me a red bicycle for my 9th birthday.
No, its my crude way of telling Mike Wallace to KISS my bum using Paul Stanley as a surrogate for the object of my disdain with Gene Simmons as a stand-in for WW.
To be sure, if Wallace had been interviewing Mel Gibson, he would ask "Are you an anti-semite?" but in the presence of the sworn enemy of Israel, a man who has called for the wiping of Israel off the map, he says nothing. What a pitiful, pathetic and hypocritical MSM moron.
Well that will do it. My sympathies.
Wallace is to Ahmadinejad, as Dan Rather is to Saddam.
Let's hope that in a few month's the former two will be like the latter two -- has beens and out of power.
Well, there you have it - one lying cretin is interchangable with another; Mike Wallace could probably trade places with Dan Rather and most of us would only pause to wonder, "Wait a minute..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.