Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kidd
Yes, but in general elections, the "elitist" towns vote Republican (Westport being the obvious exception), while the trashy, er, blue collar towns vote Democratic.

The fact that the left-side-of-the-income-curve Dems voted for Lieberman does not change the fact that in competative general elections, the white collar towns go GOP, while the schlub towns go Dem.

Also keep in mind that Liberalman got the black vote by a considerable margin.

So no, the fat lunchpail types are not "conservative" unless it means confirming their public sector and/or union jobs.

Lamont and Liberalman: not a dime's difference in anything but rhetoric.

66 posted on 08/11/2006 12:42:49 PM PDT by Clemenza (Need new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Clemenza
"while the trashy, er, blue collar towns vote Democratic."

In my view, that's changing, to some extent. For instance, after Bush was elected over Kerry, complaints were heard from the blue staters along the lines of this, "hey! we're the ones with all the money, how come those red staters are running the country now?"

There are alot of pretty elite towns that go Dem. Charlottesville, VA for one, Manhattan for another. 'Course, I don't know Connecticut too well.

The very wealthiest folk of all seem to be over on the Left.

68 posted on 08/11/2006 1:45:36 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson