Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The subject is both timely and of obvious interest to Freepers. I think most of you will find the logic here to be probable.

John / Billybob

1 posted on 08/09/2006 10:40:12 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: Congressman Billybob

The Kook-Fringe Party has been born. A recent poll showed that a third of Americans think the government had something to do with 9-11, so they have their base.


2 posted on 08/09/2006 10:47:58 AM PDT by GeronL (http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
The thing that struck me about Ned Lamont's victory celebration is the vigorous cheers that came when Lamont said that "stay the course" was not good policy. I've never known any nation to so embrace defeat and surrender as such a positive good as that bunch. Even if somebody is against the war, do they have to make the possibility of surrender such a joyful event?

Surely this mindset is way off on the margin.

We're going to quit! We're going to quit! RAH! RAH! RAH!

3 posted on 08/09/2006 10:49:24 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

"Back in 1936, Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the party of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. And he walked away from his party, and he never returned to the day he died, because to this day, the leadership of that party has been taking that party, that honorable party, down the road in the image of the labor socialist party of England."

Ronald Reagan "The Speech" - 1964


4 posted on 08/09/2006 10:51:26 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Sure you don't want to move to Sugarland and run in the 22nd district? /chuckle

Nice article.


5 posted on 08/09/2006 10:53:25 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
One reason I tend to distrust filthy-rich people who buy their way into office – regardless of their politics or party – is that they are disconnected from real life.

I like filthy rich people. They are not going to steal my car, murder me, etc. Plus, they or someone in their family probably did something really good to get wealthy in the first place. They also pay about 10 times or more the taxes that I pay, they provide more jobs, etc. Fithy rich is better than the alternative, poor people who are often stupid, and middle class people who know almost nothing about macro issues.

I like GH bush, GW bush, Arnold, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, Bill Frist, Pete Dupont, Steve Forbes, Tiger Woods, Charles Barkely, the late John Heinz, Pete DuPont, etc.

The Kennedys I can do without along with the Hollywood rich, but mostly the rich are the cream of our society.

6 posted on 08/09/2006 10:54:37 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

I guess this makes Bill Clinton a latter-day Whig? He'd probably like to go down in history as the "Last Democrat President."


8 posted on 08/09/2006 11:00:10 AM PDT by Tallguy (The problem with this war is the name... You don't wage war against a tactic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Just a small nit to pick:

"That brings us back to Ned Lamont. A prime mover in putting him into office was MoveOn.org."

Lamont isn't in office yet.

9 posted on 08/09/2006 11:01:56 AM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

« Gloating Over Democrats’ Self Destruction
Chad Vader, Episode Two »
07.08.06
Who is Ned Lamont?
Politics, Harvard, Left Think, Democrats, 2006 Elections, Joseph Lieberman, Phillips Exeter Academy, Corliss Lamont
line

I knew he was a commie, of course. But not until I read Martin Peretz, in the Wall Street Journal, did I realise that he is an hereditary commie of impeccable red-diaper origins: old money, with Exeter, Harvard, and Stalin as family traditions.

Left-wing Democrats are once again fielding single-issue “peace candidates,” and the one in Connecticut, like several in the 1970s, is a middle-aged patrician, seeking office de haut en bas, and almost entirely because he can. It’s really quite remarkable how someone like Ned Lamont, from the stock of Morgan partner Thomas Lamont and that most high-born American Stalinist, Corliss Lamont, still sends a chill of “having arrived” up the spines of his suburban supporters simply by asking them to support him.

http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=1392

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115490367543028221.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corliss_Lamont

http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=1393


10 posted on 08/09/2006 11:02:02 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

bttt


11 posted on 08/09/2006 11:04:55 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (The only way to bring a permanent peace is to eliminate the permanent threat. - FReeper Optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
"....Madeline Albright, who in turn is Neville Chamberlain in drag."

Should have added the requisite apologies to Mr. Chamberlain.

15 posted on 08/09/2006 11:27:21 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Nice! Thanks for the researched history lesson and informed opinions.

Bttt

16 posted on 08/09/2006 11:32:51 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob


Democrats: The party of the working man - like Michael Moore, Bono, Steven Spielburg. You know, the poor low class slobs that can never seem to get a break...


20 posted on 08/09/2006 12:01:48 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Here here. I couln't agree more. EXCELLENT commentary. :)


27 posted on 08/09/2006 6:18:54 PM PDT by TexasPatriot8 (Irrational is the person who is offended by the mention of a God that he doesn't believe exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

BUMP


29 posted on 08/09/2006 6:36:35 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Fidel - NO MAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

So, tell me again, why is the Dem party dead? Because Ned Lamont bought his nomination, that makes them crosswise from the American people?


I'd have thought that if there was a chance, it was more because they're moving leftward too quickly and too openly. Not that any of the ordinary guys I know who vote Dem seem to have much awareness of that.

However, I hope your assessment is correct.


32 posted on 08/09/2006 6:45:29 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Good post. Bump


37 posted on 08/09/2006 7:29:20 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Cool, now if we only had a conservative party to replace them with.
38 posted on 08/09/2006 8:03:21 PM PDT by Boiling point (When the GOP asks for donations, send them PESOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

The Democratic Party died in 1968 with the rejection of the New Deal/Great Society. With that rejection, the old Democratic coalition of the mid-20th Century came unglued. What it morphed into was the New Democrat Party, which stands for nothing, but is an amalgamation of amoral relativists, labor goons, crackheads, perverts, power lusters, malcontents, baby-killers, nihilists, appeasers, shiftless "victims", sociopaths, race-baiters, radical atheists, journalists, and other ne'er-do-wells of assorted social pathologies. And it represents about 48% of the electorate.


39 posted on 08/10/2006 10:09:12 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JasonC

Ping.


41 posted on 08/10/2006 12:39:33 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great analysis Congressman. I agree that Lieberman's party has wandered into the desert without a pillar of smoke or fire to guide them.


44 posted on 08/10/2006 1:12:06 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (Crush Islamofacists; see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson