Unbelievable,ha!
1 posted on
08/08/2006 5:22:56 PM PDT by
mdittmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: mdittmar
FAUXTOGRAPHY....a new word coined by a fellow freeper.
2 posted on
08/08/2006 5:25:36 PM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: mdittmar
There is no attempt by Reuters to influence world opinion against Israel. Mr. Gary Hersham is a man of upstanding character who approves photographs that are real and honest.
3 posted on
08/08/2006 5:25:51 PM PDT by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
To: mdittmar
I tweaked your headline a bit...;-)
To: mdittmar
Unbelievable,ha!That's why I don't believe it and I'd be insulted if Reuters actually had any credibility.
5 posted on
08/08/2006 5:28:13 PM PDT by
Family Guy
(I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to shut up.)
To: mdittmar
In other words..."We got caught this time"
6 posted on
08/08/2006 5:28:22 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: mdittmar
7 posted on
08/08/2006 5:28:27 PM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(No tag line, currently.)
To: mdittmar
Fauxtography. I'm stealing that.
12 posted on
08/08/2006 5:30:08 PM PDT by
null and void
(Bipartisanship: when the Stupid Party & the Evil Party agree on something that is both stupid & evil)
To: mdittmar
"I believe he was trying to take a picture and make it better rather than trying to take a picture and make a statement," Hershorn told National Public Radio in an interview aired today. PLEASE!....do they really expect us to believe that!
14 posted on
08/08/2006 5:30:46 PM PDT by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: mdittmar
18 posted on
08/08/2006 5:32:26 PM PDT by
VOA
To: mdittmar
"I believe he was trying to take a picture and make it better rather than trying to take a picture and make a statement," Hershorn told National Public Radio in an interview aired today.Hershorn obviously knows the right audience to peddle his BS to...
To: mdittmar
You deserve an award for this new word: Fauxtography
To: mdittmar
Most convincing! Do they have some Photoshopped Photos from Israel that they ran where they can show similar editing of "dust"?
ML/NJ
24 posted on
08/08/2006 5:34:30 PM PDT by
ml/nj
To: mdittmar
Just how does dust get on a digital photograph?
25 posted on
08/08/2006 5:34:51 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: mdittmar
I've been doing digital photography for about ten years now...DUST on a picture has NEVER been a problem.
Now I have a digital SLR, Nikon D70s, and the manual DOES speak about dust getting on the mirror etc., however, my experience thus far is that the 'dust' has to be pretty big and numerous to cause an exposure issue. The CCD that scans the incoming image can get dust on it too, but that, according to Nikon, takes a good long while.
This sob Hajj was LYING and faking his pics...pure and simple.
G
26 posted on
08/08/2006 5:35:16 PM PDT by
GRRRRR
(WHERE is the next Ronald Reagan? Virginia?)
To: mdittmar
And I believe in the tooth fairy!
28 posted on
08/08/2006 5:36:28 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: mdittmar
****"I believe he was trying to take a picture and make it better rather than trying to take a picture and make a statement***
If this guy believes that he must be retarded.
29 posted on
08/08/2006 5:36:33 PM PDT by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: mdittmar
No, he was
LYING.
Let's just pretend it was FOX NEWS manipulating images...or the White House...or (gasp) Tom DeLay's campaign.
THERE WOULD BE CONSTANT COVERAGE FROM TODAY UNTIL MID-NOVEMBER...ON THE ALPHABET NETWORKS and the NY SLIMES!
But Reuters will get a pass.
31 posted on
08/08/2006 5:38:10 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: finnman69
To: mdittmar
Gobbledygook talk. Reuters permits photoshop except when they don't. The photo guy got terminated because he got caught. Reuters will either rehire him when the fuss dies down or find him a job with some other news organization.
34 posted on
08/08/2006 5:39:15 PM PDT by
crazyhorse691
(Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
To: mdittmar
My vote is 20 years for the photog and 10 million fine for Reuters. Next offense doubles.......
36 posted on
08/08/2006 5:39:38 PM PDT by
ErieGeno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson