Posted on 08/08/2006 2:33:57 PM PDT by pissant
Are we even sure that Reuters News Agency is really named Reuters News Agency?
I was trying to be funny. I was replying to another post from someone who couldn't speak english...
The first?
"Not just Reuters. As I mentioned in another post, NBC carried the same story, complete with footage of wailing veiled woman."
Thanks for the info. and not surprising.
I'm sorry that I misjudged you.
That's okay, it happened earlier today and I was in a hurry and I think I was replying to two similar threads, and this id10t who barely spoke English said something stupid, and I think I got mixed up and replied bas-ackwords. So whatever I said on the other thread probably made even less sense. Although it is all still rather humorous, even if the joke is on me.
Oh, now I get it. LOL! Glad that's all it was. :0)
Is Reuters imploding?
It seems the AP, NYT and Reuters are being eaten alive with the truth.
The problem with mainstream media journalists is that they think the reason people rely on them for information is because they're stupid and don't know better.
72 Scarface ladies at once!! Allahu Crowbar!!! or whatever. (sarcasm)
Reuters are really busy aren't they? It must be hard to keep up with what is a doctored photo and what isn't. A day without a Reuters forgery is like a day without sunshine these days.
I am hereby throwing down the gauntlet of photoshop challenge: Scarface lady, Baghdad Bob, Green Helmet Guy, Mother Sheehan AND Fidel "Blood & Butts" Castro in one (or more) Reuters-worthy pictures. Please, for the sake of our funny bones, GO for it. LOLOL
Sheesh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.