Skip to comments.
Another bogus photo?
Hot Air ^
| 8/8/2006
| AllahPundit
Posted on 08/08/2006 2:13:48 PM PDT by Uncledave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Uncledave
About the toys...don't you know that Disney is heavily into product placement? Obviously, this war is being sponsored by the Mouse & Co.!
21
posted on
08/08/2006 2:54:28 PM PDT
by
blu
(People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
To: Republican Red
These people were 'removed from under the ruble' and yet, they don't seem to have a scratch on them. Or blood for that matter.
White 'sheets' and no blood??
Fake???? Hmmmmmmmm???????
22
posted on
08/08/2006 2:56:17 PM PDT
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Bigh4u2
About the bodies, go to the link, then see the correction link. It appears that "sitting up guy" was really dead...different angles, different photos. Very interesting.
23
posted on
08/08/2006 3:03:54 PM PDT
by
blu
(People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
To: Moose4
That aint no missile strike, period.
24
posted on
08/08/2006 3:07:57 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: blu
I see it now. Sorry all.
It's really getting hard to tell what is real and what is fake. When in doubt I conclude fake. Opinion Journal links to the source of the pictures and says:
"that I have now seen several photographs of the scene with the man I thought was getting up. His position is more or less the same in them all, suggesting rigor mortis."
http://www.theaugeanstables.com/2006/08/06/post-on-washington-post-removed/print/
25
posted on
08/08/2006 3:08:51 PM PDT
by
Republican Red
(Everyone is super stoked on Gore, even if they don't know it)
To: blu; weegee
Many years ago there was a famous NYC news photog who carried around a teddy bear in his car. Any time a child was involved in any way with what he was shooting, the teddy bear would appear in the pic.
26
posted on
08/08/2006 3:11:10 PM PDT
by
Roccus
To: blu
27
posted on
08/08/2006 3:11:24 PM PDT
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Uncledave
My thoughts after viewing the car hit by missiles;ROFLMAO. It's a joke, right. No evidence of burn marks, no evidence of explosion, heck, even the dry brush touching the vehicle on the passengers side is unburnt. Guess the photographers are being overly ambitious for the prestigious Pulletzer(rotten egg) Prize.
28
posted on
08/08/2006 3:12:52 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
To: South40
29
posted on
08/08/2006 3:25:02 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Republican Red
STOP!! you guys are KILLING me!!
30
posted on
08/08/2006 3:26:15 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Republican Red
To: trailboss800; Suzy Quzy
See my post #25. Seems I missed the "update" section of the original post at Opinion Journal. It has been concluded that the guy is dead and is showing signs of
rigor mortis.
Hard to believe but this one is "real".
32
posted on
08/08/2006 3:41:49 PM PDT
by
Republican Red
(Everyone is super stoked on Gore, even if they don't know it)
To: Republican Red
Thanks.....you had a good eye tho.
33
posted on
08/08/2006 3:42:44 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: South40
Holy frijoles!
That commercial would never go over here in the USA.
34
posted on
08/08/2006 3:45:36 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Creation "science" has a final answer--adherence to the scriptures. All other data are discarded.)
To: All
To: GeorgiaDawg32
that car isn't damaged as badly as one is after a good old-fashioned Central Texas hail storm..
You nailed that one!
36
posted on
08/08/2006 3:50:02 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Republican Red
Yes, but remember...that building had supposedly collapsed just a few hours before. There's no possible way that that man's body could have developed that kind of rigor mortis (note that his arm is sticking STRAIGHT UP into the air from a prone position) in just a couple of hours.
Something is still very, very fishy with those pictures. I've seen one timeline that stated that the IAF bombed in the vicinity of that building at midnight but the building didn't collapse until after a nearby airstrike *eight hours later*. I don't know if that's accurate or not, but if it is, why would people still be in a damaged building eight hours after it had been hit? The whole thing still smells.
}:-)4
37
posted on
08/08/2006 4:11:34 PM PDT
by
Moose4
(Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson