I see it now. Sorry all.
It's really getting hard to tell what is real and what is fake. When in doubt I conclude fake. Opinion Journal links to the source of the pictures and says:
"that I have now seen several photographs of the scene with the man I thought was getting up. His position is more or less the same in them all, suggesting rigor mortis."
http://www.theaugeanstables.com/2006/08/06/post-on-washington-post-removed/print/
Yes, but remember...that building had supposedly collapsed just a few hours before. There's no possible way that that man's body could have developed that kind of rigor mortis (note that his arm is sticking STRAIGHT UP into the air from a prone position) in just a couple of hours.
Something is still very, very fishy with those pictures. I've seen one timeline that stated that the IAF bombed in the vicinity of that building at midnight but the building didn't collapse until after a nearby airstrike *eight hours later*. I don't know if that's accurate or not, but if it is, why would people still be in a damaged building eight hours after it had been hit? The whole thing still smells.
}:-)4