Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dallas may drop the hammer on toy guns
Dallas Morning News (TX) ^ | 8/8/06 | DAVE LEVINTHAL

Posted on 08/08/2006 9:32:18 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

Dallas may drop the hammer on toy guns

Safety panel vote puts city closer to adopting strict ordinance

11:10 PM CDT on Monday, August 7, 2006

By DAVE LEVINTHAL / The Dallas Morning News

They're Americana slipped into the holsters of little boys in cowboy hats.

But after a 7-1 vote by the City Council's public safety committee, Dallas is closer than ever to passing one of the nation's strictest ordinances regulating the sale and possession of toy guns.

The committee directed City Attorney Tom Perkins to craft an ordinance that would ban all toy guns except those painted a bright color, such as hot pink or neon green, or made of transparent or translucent material.

The toys would also have to reflect light.

Toy guns that don't fit the city's paint/reflection criteria would be illegal even if kept inside a private home or vehicle, council members said.

"I would have liked to see the city absolutely outlaw toy look-alike replica guns, but to get anything progressive done in this part of the country is significant," said the Rev. Peter Johnson, who through the community activism organization Weed & Seed has advocated banning toy guns locally.

Dallas should model its proposal after New York City's toy-gun ordinance, regarded as one of the country's most stringent, the committee told Mr. Perkins. A small percentage of municipalities, including Plano, have also further regulated toy guns beyond a federal provision requiring toy makers to place an orange cap over gun barrels.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; bang; banglist; constitution; dallas; gungrabbers; nannystate; pc; politicalcorrectness; politicallycorrect; secondamendment; texas; texasliberals; toyguns; toys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: weegee
I wouldn't want Hollywood to have rights than a mere citizen does not.

I don't think I want Hollywood liberals to have the rights citizens DO have.

61 posted on 08/08/2006 4:00:39 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
They can't. Those are their constituents, the ones that voted for them. Them, and all the dead guys.

What? Are you saying that Texas isn't full of rough, tough good ol' boy conservatives? You mean there are soft-on-crime liberals and criminals there? No it can't be! The Texas Freepers have told me that such people only live in California. This is such a letdown.

Next you'll be telling me there are homosexuals in Texas.

62 posted on 08/08/2006 4:14:44 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: All
"Toy guns that don't fit the city's paint/reflection criteria would be illegal even if kept inside a private home or vehicle, council members said."

Now that's @#!%&ed up. So, people can have real guns in their homes (as it should be), but they need to make sure that they throw out any toy versions. What are they trying to accomplish here? Morons.

63 posted on 08/08/2006 4:22:02 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Dang! Why didn't you suggest that 35 years ago!?!


64 posted on 08/08/2006 6:47:32 PM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Well, do you still have a BB gun?


65 posted on 08/08/2006 8:40:49 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

LOL, actually we do have one (my son's). But, I think I'll just stick to keeping squirrels out of the pecan tree. Although back in the day, shooting matches would have been fun for sure.


66 posted on 08/09/2006 3:02:40 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
what they need to ban is worthless politicians.

Then there wouldn't BE any politicians. Which may not be so bad, really.

67 posted on 08/09/2006 3:06:39 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson