1 posted on
08/08/2006 12:08:04 AM PDT by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
killed at least 15 people What sort of "people"? Combatants?
more than 50 people died, including three Israeli soldiers.
And the other 47 "people"? Combatants?
2 posted on
08/08/2006 12:13:57 AM PDT by
JennysCool
(Roll out the Canarble Wagon!)
To: RWR8189
UN? It should become a target-rich environment. Fire away!
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
3 posted on
08/08/2006 12:17:00 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: RWR8189
Hizbullah militants fired more than 100 rockets into northern Israel And Israel responds with one air strike and this is the backwards story we get. Sigh. . .
4 posted on
08/08/2006 12:20:24 AM PDT by
Flyer
(Don't question the questioner)
To: RWR8189
OH Boy!.... Does the other side whine and cry when they get a taste of their own medicine!
6 posted on
08/08/2006 12:22:47 AM PDT by
Dallas59
To: RWR8189
"The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure is a violation of international law." Sheesh...where was the above UN whiner when Serbia was getting bombed to Hell in 1999?
9 posted on
08/08/2006 12:28:09 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: RWR8189
Israeli officials said the engineers would become a target if they attempted to repair the bridge. Gosh..why can't someone sat link this stuff so we can all get popcorn and beer and enjoy the show! :-)
10 posted on
08/08/2006 12:28:49 AM PDT by
Bobalu
(This is not the tag line you are looking for.....move along (waves hand))
To: RWR8189
"an air strike on a southern district killed at least 15 people"
Judging from how the Left Media have been flat out liars about casualties, photos and everything else that goes against Israel, we need to work with this basic math equation...
10(a)=Leftist Media reported deaths by Israeli Military strike
10(x)=15
10(1.5)=15
x=1.5=2
The figure of 15 killed translates to the truth that 2 people were killed, after you consider their lies which are at a minimum of 10(x)=Media reported deaths on people killed by the Israeli Military (where x=actual deaths), and then we need to round up to 2 people killed.
12 posted on
08/08/2006 12:39:22 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: RWR8189
"The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure is a violation of international law." In other words, we need to leave the bridges up so our friends can move more rockets in.
20 posted on
08/08/2006 4:17:46 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: RWR8189
Why do they report about defensive actions, and not those of the Hezbollah agressors? Geez, agenda here or what?
22 posted on
08/08/2006 4:19:26 AM PDT by
Toby06
(True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
To: RWR8189
Senior UN officials reacted angrily to the destruction of a temporary causeway over the Litani river overnight. "We must be able to have movement throughout the country to deliver supplies. At this point we can't do that," said David Shearer, the humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon. "The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure is a violation of international law." IN other words, Kofi is pissed that he cannot deliver more Syrian arms to the Hezzies because the roads are out.
And that bit about "deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure" is a joke, right? Is he saying that there is a seperate and unique set of roads and infrastructure used by terrorists that should have been destroyed, and that "civilian" roads should be left alone? They MUST be kidding....
31 posted on
08/08/2006 5:50:41 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. also
2006israelwar or WOT
..................
40 posted on
08/08/2006 7:02:17 AM PDT by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: RWR8189
They should attack the u.n. "peacekeepers" if they try to repair the bridges.
On second thought, they should attack the u.n. "peacekeepers" on general principles.
43 posted on
08/08/2006 7:41:56 AM PDT by
sport
(cognizes)
To: RWR8189
"The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure is a violation of international law." Since when is destroying bridges in a war a violation of international law? Bridges are strategic.
48 posted on
08/08/2006 9:27:29 AM PDT by
Naspino
(Not creative enough to have a tagline.)
To: RWR8189
Israel also threatened to attack UN peacekeepers if they attempted to repair bomb-damaged bridges in southern Lebanon. Light 'em up, Ehud!!!
49 posted on
08/08/2006 7:51:51 PM PDT by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson