Posted on 08/07/2006 6:23:18 AM PDT by noodlehead
Today’s “International Community, that group of utterly feckless, corrupt, boobs produce lots of words, resolutions and demands but of course no substantial action. The head hypocrite and the worst Secretary General in U.N history Mr. Koffi Annan has overseen the continued devolution of an already failed , corrupt and inept institution.
Mr. Annan’s has overseen the devolution of this never-good institution into an institution of moral and criminal depravity. Here are some of the things Mr. Anna’s U.N has accomplished:
* Engaged in the rape and pimping of adolescent refugees in around the globe.
* Overseen the largest bribery scandal in the history of the world-Saddam’s oil for weapons and bought votes program. Mr. ANNAN’s SON, KOJO PERSONALLY RECEIVED BRIBES and it is difficult to believe that Mr. Annan was not aware of it at the time. Mr. Annan however has worked assiduously to cover-up this and the other facts concerning this corruption....
(Excerpt) Read more at savethesoldiers.com ...
And this is news to whom?
Calling the UN "boobs" is paying them a compliment they don't deserve. Boobs are actually useful.
And pretty. There's nothing pretty about the UN ...
Someone will have to explain to me why Israel should have a UNIFIL force protecting them when it was the same UNIFIL force that allowed the hezzies 6 years to build up their armaments.
Because the UN has become an malevolent, muslim loving, terrorist appeasing, Western hating third world playground.
The UN would have to take a major step up to compared to boobs. I will not insult boobs by comparing them to the Useless Nations.
Speaking of boobs, Lillian Carter had the biggest pair of boobs in the world. They were named Jimmy and Billy
You said boobs in your title. We have rules.
Double D's. Dumb and Dumber
I'm wondering if Pissant sees the word Boobs in the title and stumbles in here.
I think back in pride to the paper I wrote for Civics half a century ago. It was entitled "What are the Problems of the UN?" The teacher didn't like the title, since it focused on only the negative. But that was exactly the right approach; I knew at the time that the teacher was wrong.What I did not know at the time was that "world opinion" is just journalistic opinion - nor the extent to which "Utterly Feckless,Corrupt group of Boobs" was the proper description of "objective" journalism.
Note:
I don't oppose the First Amendment; in fact I think it would be a great idea and we should try it some time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.