Posted on 08/05/2006 9:13:48 AM PDT by SmithL
A federal judge expressed sympathy Friday for two Chronicle reporters facing subpoenas for their sources of grand jury testimony about steroids in sports, but he said legal precedent works against their request to keep those sources secret.
"I think that you have a very compelling argument'' that courts should recognize a right of journalists to protect their sources, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White told the reporters' lawyer, Jonathan Donnellan, near the end of a hearing in San Francisco that lasted almost two hours. White observed that most states and an increasing number of foreign nations have adopted laws to protect sources and that the federal government has become "more aggressive in going after reporters.''
But the judge questioned whether he had a free hand to protect Chronicle reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1972 that journalists have no constitutional right to refuse to identify their sources before a grand jury.
Also, he noted, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco -- which has carved out protections for reporters in certain types of cases since 1972 -- rejected any such exemptions in a 1993 case involving grand jury testimony.
"No case ... has held to the contrary,'' White said, suggesting that as a lower-court judge he was bound by the rulings.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
A new class of citizens who are above the law: reporters.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"I think that you have a very compelling argument'' that courts should recognize a right of journalists to protect their sources, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White .... White observed that most states and an increasing number of foreign nations have adopted laws to protect sources...''
White, Jeffrey Steven. Nominated by George W. Bush on July 25, 2002
So much for Dubya nominating Judges who don't want to make law or look to *&%^&% "foreign nations"! I wonder how much input the 'conservative' church lady Harriet Miers and bonehead Andy Card had in picking this nimrod.
And it appears the ONLY reason he didn't side with the reporters was that he'd be overturned.
Someone should ask the judge to define the word "reporter."
And someone should also ask him to define "Judge".
"But the judge questioned whether he had a free hand to protect..."
"Free Hand"?? WTF is he pondering whether he "has a free hand" to do anything. The SOB acknowledges SCOTUS rulings and even the 9th Circus, yet he's wondering if he "has a free hand".
Hey 'judge', the law is the law, and that's U.S. Law. Not Andorra's, Lichtenstein's or GD Botswana's.
Good points, all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.