Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge hears arguments over Chronicle reporters' subpoenas
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/5/6 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 08/05/2006 9:13:48 AM PDT by SmithL

A federal judge expressed sympathy Friday for two Chronicle reporters facing subpoenas for their sources of grand jury testimony about steroids in sports, but he said legal precedent works against their request to keep those sources secret.

"I think that you have a very compelling argument'' that courts should recognize a right of journalists to protect their sources, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White told the reporters' lawyer, Jonathan Donnellan, near the end of a hearing in San Francisco that lasted almost two hours. White observed that most states and an increasing number of foreign nations have adopted laws to protect sources and that the federal government has become "more aggressive in going after reporters.''

But the judge questioned whether he had a free hand to protect Chronicle reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1972 that journalists have no constitutional right to refuse to identify their sources before a grand jury.

Also, he noted, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco -- which has carved out protections for reporters in certain types of cases since 1972 -- rejected any such exemptions in a 1993 case involving grand jury testimony.

"No case ... has held to the contrary,'' White said, suggesting that as a lower-court judge he was bound by the rulings.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: balco; sfcomicle; steroids

1 posted on 08/05/2006 9:13:49 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

A new class of citizens who are above the law: reporters.


2 posted on 08/05/2006 9:18:56 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

School of Law - Boalt Hall University of California, Berkeley

Search
 

Students
Courses
Alumni
Admissions
Faculty
News and Events
Publications
Administration
Library
Centers
Clinics
Contact Us
Directory
Make a Gift
Home
UC Berkeley


2002 Stories

Jeffrey White Nominated for U.S. District Court Bench
Lecturer Jeffrey S. White has been nominated by President Bush to the federal bench. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, he will serve as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

White has taught a course in civil trial advocacy at Boalt Hall for more than 20 years and has won the Roscoe Pound Foundation award for Excellence in Teaching Trial Advocacy. He is also a litigation partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco.

"Jeff has been an outstanding teacher and mentor to students at Boalt for decades," says Dean John P. Dwyer '80. "Jeff's nomination recognizes his impressive legal career, and I believe he would make an excellent federal judge. We are proud to have Jeff as part of the Boalt community."

A related story about White's nomination is available in The Recorder (subscription required).

For more information, please contact Chris Bush at 510-643-8215 or cbush@law.berkeley.edu.
(7/29/02)


© 2006 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. For questions or comments, please contact the Webmaster.


3 posted on 08/05/2006 9:22:12 AM PDT by SmithL (The fact that they can't find Hoffa is proof that he never existed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"I think that you have a very compelling argument'' that courts should recognize a right of journalists to protect their sources, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White .... White observed that most states and an increasing number of foreign nations have adopted laws to protect sources...''

White, Jeffrey Steven. Nominated by George W. Bush on July 25, 2002

So much for Dubya nominating Judges who don't want to make law or look to *&%^&% "foreign nations"! I wonder how much input the 'conservative' church lady Harriet Miers and bonehead Andy Card had in picking this nimrod.

And it appears the ONLY reason he didn't side with the reporters was that he'd be overturned.

4 posted on 08/05/2006 9:37:31 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Someone should ask the judge to define the word "reporter."


5 posted on 08/05/2006 9:41:42 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
***Someone should ask the judge to define the word "reporter."***

And someone should also ask him to define "Judge".

"But the judge questioned whether he had a free hand to protect..."

"Free Hand"?? WTF is he pondering whether he "has a free hand" to do anything. The SOB acknowledges SCOTUS rulings and even the 9th Circus, yet he's wondering if he "has a free hand".

Hey 'judge', the law is the law, and that's U.S. Law. Not Andorra's, Lichtenstein's or GD Botswana's.

6 posted on 08/05/2006 9:52:30 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Good points, all.


7 posted on 08/05/2006 11:03:08 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson