Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats’ soul on line in two races
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 8/4/06 | Jim Wooten

Posted on 08/04/2006 8:35:32 PM PDT by LdSentinal

Republicans don’t have a dog in either fight, but two nationally significant races on Tuesday’s ballot will tell us a great deal about the mood of the country — and the future of two-party politics.

The one, of course, is Georgia’s 4th Congressional District, where incumbent Rep. Cynthia McKinney is in the final stages of her political career. But for an out-of-district white guy who sapped 5,253 votes, most of which otherwise would have gone to challenger Hank Johnson, she would be walking around in stunned defeat now. Johnson may not beat her Tuesday, but the end is near. Her political salvation — and it is only remotely possible that she is psychologically equipped to do it — is to move from the fringe.

In this contest, Republicans and conservatives have nothing to gain from her defeat and a fair amount to lose. On legislation, Johnson and McKinney will vote the same. They’re both liberal Democrats. The difference is that Johnson is less likely to do and say things that strike reasonable people as nutty. That’s not a good swap for Republicans.

The more significant race nationally is in the Democratic primary in Connecticut, where three-term U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman, the party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee, is headed to defeat at the hands of anti-war activists who are waging their own jihad for the soul of the national Democratic Party. A July 20 poll by Quinnipiac University gave Lieberman’s challenger, cable TV mogul Ned Lamont, a 51-47 lead among likely primary voters. By Thursday that lead had grown to 54-41, according to Quinnipiac’s sampling.

Said poll director Douglas Schwartz, “Sen. Lieberman’s campaign bus seems to be stuck in reverse. Despite visits from former President Bill Clinton and other big-name Democrats, Lieberman has not been able to stem the tide to Lamont.”

The Lieberman-Lamont race, as Schwartz notes, is a testament to the growing power of the blogs, which emerged as a political force in Howard Dean’s 2004 presidential campaign. “Three months ago,” said Schwartz, “Lamont was virtually unheard of, except perhaps on the blogs.”

Blogs, for the uninitiated, are Internet Web sites — Thinking Right is one — where people gather to debate or discuss issues of the day.

Lamont, like Johnson in DeKalb County, offers a prospective voting record that’s likely to be indistinguishable from the incumbent he’s trying to beat. In that sense, then, neither holds much interest for conservatives.

The only interest in both is what they will tell us about the direction of the party here and nationally. If McKinney loses this cycle as opposed to next, it’ll be because the black middle class finds her style slightly embarrassing.

She’s the black middle class’s Confederate battle flag. They may be drawn to her emotionally and see her confrontational style as a part of their valued heritage, but she’s become a symbol of a bygone era.

Maybe “bygone” was last week. Maybe before the war, Maybe before people came to think seriously about the divisions, which have grown more pronounced.

This runoff, then, says more about the perspective of the black middle class than it does about partisan or racial politics. The district is 59 percent black and just 33 percent white — and a fair portion of that 33 percent includes Republicans who have primary runoff interests of their own.

This is a pure play for black Democrats. They’ll be the ones to decide whether she stays or goes. This year. But if she remains the fringe Cynthia, the mainstream black middle class — somebody like DeKalb CEO Vernon Jones — will take her out.

Lieberman is a sad case. Except to speak moderately on the Iraqi phase of the war on terrorism, much as Southern Democrats once did with the nation at war, and precisely as Southern Democrat Jim Marshall, the Macon congressman who represents Georgia’s 3rd District, still does, Lieberman has committed no offense against the left.

As with the 4th District’s black middle class, a Lieberman defeat would tell us volumes — in Lieberman’s case, about the rise to dominance of the anti-war left within the national Democratic Party. His is the proxy contest. A Lamont win Tuesday fixes the party in Congress and probably for the 2008 election as well.

Republicans and conservatives have no dog in these fights. But on Wednesday morning the country will have a lot clearer idea of where the national Democratic Party’s soul has landed.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2006; congress; connecticutt; cynthia; dekalb; democrats; election; election2006; electioncongress; georgia; house; jihad; johnson; lamont; lieberman; mckinney; poll; runoff; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2006 8:35:35 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I really cannot be incited to give a damn about Lieberman. When he gave the "one more time like that, and I'm really gonna get mad..." speech on the floor of the Senate, concluding that he couldn't support impeachment - he really disqualified himself. So he's a moderate Democrat who is a realist on foreign policy. I just can't see why we should care if he's replaced with a poster child for why the Democratic party cannot be trusted with national security. Sometimes you win by losing - that's the way this situation looks to me. But then again, my county went 4:1 Bush in '04.
2 posted on 08/04/2006 8:42:29 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

This may end up as a blessing in disguise. Maybe the sane people of (dis)connecticut will understand that putting a nutcase traitor in the U.S. Senate from their state might make them all look like nutcase traitors.


3 posted on 08/04/2006 8:44:24 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Out of the frying pan and into the hottest corner we can hope.


4 posted on 08/04/2006 8:44:40 PM PDT by Medicine Warrior (There are a thousand hacking at the branches of Evil, to one who is striking at the root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

(CORRECTION) ....all look like nutcase traitors, and will vote GOP for the first time in their lives.


5 posted on 08/04/2006 8:46:36 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Lieberman is a garden variety communist demorat. He just happens to support Israel a little more fervently than most of his fellow rats. No great loss.


6 posted on 08/04/2006 8:47:05 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
I think a lot of what this article said about McKinney could be said for Lamont. He, too, is a nut. He won't vote much differently than Liebermann, except maybe on national security.

If I lived in either state and could cross over, I would vote McKinney and Lamont.

7 posted on 08/04/2006 8:47:15 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
But, But....Lamont "never heard of the blogs."
8 posted on 08/04/2006 8:49:17 PM PDT by msnimje (Uni-FAIL - UN peace keeping force in Lebanon has lived up to its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

You said it. I'd rather see the true colors Dims win than the sneaky bastards who hide behind "progressive" and "moderate" labels.


9 posted on 08/04/2006 8:49:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
IF Liebermann loses
AND
the 'Rats regain control of Congress...

...the country is flat screwed.

10 posted on 08/04/2006 8:50:38 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Sorry, Dem Party soul already in Lucifer's lockbox.
11 posted on 08/04/2006 8:51:21 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (There are only a few absolute truths in life, everything else is just an opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Wow! Democrats have Souls?


12 posted on 08/04/2006 8:52:06 PM PDT by PattonFan (Not me, I don't believe in paying for the same real estate twice." George C. Scott , "Patton")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Democrats’ soul on line in two races

Democrats have souls? Don't joke with me.
13 posted on 08/04/2006 8:54:25 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The second one ain't gonna happen.


14 posted on 08/04/2006 8:54:49 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You said it. I'd rather see the true colors Dims win than the sneaky bastards who hide behind "progressive" and "moderate" labels.

LOL! I'm sorry EEE, but, no democrat hides behind labels..they try..but we all know Every Democrats true colors..they are ALL slime.

Dopes not matter what democrat gets into office where..they all follow the pied piper of the party..they are truly all in lockstep

A Dem is a Dem is a Dem..

15 posted on 08/04/2006 8:57:15 PM PDT by PattonFan (Not me, I don't believe in paying for the same real estate twice." George C. Scott , "Patton")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Wally , losers of elections all share one thing, the winners of those elections get to rule. And then we get a Clinton.Me, I`d rather win.


16 posted on 08/04/2006 9:04:04 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
If you want to lose lunch, just watch the Lamont 5min.campaign spot. What his supporters want and demand is so far from reality and common sense. But, thats what makes them Democrats.
All of them want to cut and run from Iraq. Wonder if they think Israel should follow suit?
17 posted on 08/04/2006 9:10:41 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002

"I would vote McKinney and Lamont."



I'm with you, let chaos reign among the Dem's.


18 posted on 08/04/2006 9:18:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (Life is exquisite... of great beauty, keenly felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

It's a non-issue. Who cares about a leftist mini-state, as it does not represent the nation. Hannity needs a beeaatch slap for sucking up to Algore's #2. He's not reasonable because of only one issue, he's a senator, therefore compromiser. He can't ever be trusted. Ever.

Why republicans defend this nitwit is beyond me.


19 posted on 08/04/2006 9:23:19 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

Any American Jew that votes for a Democrat in any national race is a disgrace to their heritage. The Far Left has aligned itself with our enemies and are anti sematic this is no coincidence that he is polling badly being of Jewish Heritage. In any event if Americans are really falling sway to the lefts propaganda machine and if the GOP polling numbers are true then it is inevitable that the Left will regain the house and senate in NOV and have us out of Iraq. The Shiites in Iran and Iraq will unify, arms transports will have no problem going from Iran thru Iraq into Syria. No conquest of nations is needed because these nations will fall due to our lack of resolve. These are Historic times in my mind likened to the mid 1930's and the rise of power of the Nazi propaganda machine in Europe. Islamo-Facists are rising to power the Liberals again are on the wrong side of history and have now sided with our enemy and they refuse to see the complex nature of the terrorist regimes and the threat that the rise of Islamo-Facism is to us and our allies.


20 posted on 08/04/2006 9:35:10 PM PDT by tomnbeverly (The mild 2006 Hurricane Season is a Karl Rove ploy to refute liberal Global Warming Claims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson