Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Redefining Terrorism (Joe Farah On America's Denial Of Jihad Alert)
Wordnetdaily.com ^ | 08/04/06 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 08/04/2006 3:35:53 AM PDT by goldstategop

Have you noticed that when America declared war on terrorism, it immediately began to redefine the term.

Here's the way it works.

President Bush told the nations they were either with us or with the terrorists. Remember that speech? It may have been the high point of his administration.

But he didn't mean it.

The most recent proof is the suggestion within his administration that Syria be used to mediate the Hezbollah-Israeli conflict.

Bush's own State Department, which is no different than Bill Clinton's State Department or Jimmy Carter's State Department, classifies Syria as a terrorist-sponsoring nation. In fact, Syria sponsors Hezbollah, along with Iran.

Yet, the Bush administration actually suggested Syria mediate the dispute. This would be akin to having China mediate our dispute with North Korea. Oh, I forgot. The Bush administration suggested that, too.

What gives? Is Hezbollah no longer a terrorist organization? Is it no longer considered an enemy of the U.S. and the free world? Is it not indeed the largest terrorist organization in the world? Why is it that we no longer seek to destroy Hezbollah, but preserve it through mediation? And, even more bizarre, why do we consider using as a mediator a state sponsor of terrorism?

But there's more evidence America is redefining terrorism to avoid the harsh realities of the threat we face.

Last week, Muslim Naveed Avzal Haq, 30, took a 13-year-old girl hostage and began shooting up the Seattle Jewish Federation Center, killing one woman and injuring five others, including one who was pregnant. "I am a Muslim American," he shouted. "I am angry at Israel."

Not one newscast and not one news story (besides those in WND) labeled this terrorist act a terrorist act. It was a shooting. It was a "hate crime." It was a random act of violence" by a man not associated with any other organizations." On and on the euphemisms went.

But a 6-year-old schoolchild would recognize what happened in Seattle. It was terrorism.

We've seen this kind of denial before – and it has always been dangerous for America. It was the kind of denial that led directly to Sept. 11.

Quite frankly, terrorists weren't getting the ''credit'' they expected from major attacks like the Oklahoma City bombing and TWA Flight 800 and the first World Trade Center bombing. So they upped the ante. They raised the stakes.

No one could deny what Sept. 11 was. It was an overt act of undeniable terror – unspeakable terror, unimaginable terror.

Why do we deny terrorism when it is staring us in the face? Because it requires action – response. If we are not prepared to take action – to respond appropriately – we instinctively deny the reality of what has transpired.

Add to all this that ''terrorism'' was never the enemy any way. Terrorism, as many have pointed out, is a tactic, not an enemy. The real enemy is radical Islam. Terrorism is their tactic. If we don't recognize that fact, it should surprise no one that a Muslim fanatic can shoot up a Jewish center without anyone mentioning terrorism.

So President Bush, to his credit, responded after Sept. 11. But we're still paying the price for his lack of focus, his inability or unwillingness to define the enemy clearly, his desire not to hurt anyone's feelings or offend any ethnic or religious group.

But let's not resort to doublespeak. Let's not miss the forest for the trees. In our desire not to ethnically profile, do we have to give up all logic and common sense? Do we have to change the meaning of words? Do we have to put our heads in the sand?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; denial; hezbollah; islamofascism; israel; israelwar2006; jihad; presidentbush; syria; worldnetdaily
Again, we deny the jihad out of political correctness and an aversion to seeing the full extent of the danger and the enemy's plans for us. Changing how we define terrorism isn't going to make it go way. Insisting that the terrorist attack in Seattle, Washington State wasn't the work of a jihadist is evidence of our ability to deny reality staring us in the face. Its not a war on terror like we like to facilely pretend. Its a war against radical Islam. And if we don't wake up, then it will find with far more destructiveness than it did on 9/11. As much we want to try, we are not living in a normal time and there is no way to ever escape again to a "holiday from history." Because if we don't write the chapter of the story unfolding in front of us right now, it will be written for us by our enemies. Its time to focus on the enemy and get over the concern for people's feelings. If we're all dead, our soliticiousness won't matter.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

1 posted on 08/04/2006 3:35:54 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You know Bush also called Islam the 'religion of peace'. It is not and the president should come to that realization.

We need to have our own Jihad...against Islam......period. We can call it a 'Crusade' if we like, but it needs to start soon.


Radical Islam is an insane murder cult.
Moderate Islam is its Trojan Horse in the West.


2 posted on 08/04/2006 3:45:00 AM PDT by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The UN has decided not to call Hezbollah a terrorist organization. More white washing that only postpones the day of reckoning, and yes, it'll be far worse than dealing with reality now. It's true that terrorists feel and are angry that they're not getting the 'respect' they deserve, the 'credit' for their attacks. They'll certainly up the ante. Well, here comes the end of August and any minute now Iran -- with a lunatic in charge -- will have nukes. Thank you, Jimmy Carter.


3 posted on 08/04/2006 3:50:45 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
...Because it requires action – response. ...

We are acting. We are responding. Hooray President Bush!

4 posted on 08/04/2006 4:16:08 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: goldstategop
"The real enemy is radical Islam."

RADICAL ISLAM = ISLAM

"...his inability or unwillingness to define the
enemy clearly, his desire not to hurt anyone's
feelings or offend any ethnic or religious group."

6 posted on 08/04/2006 4:31:28 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.

also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

7 posted on 08/04/2006 5:31:48 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Exactly right, goldstategop!


8 posted on 08/04/2006 7:07:08 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (The Arab League jihad continues on like a fart in an elevator - FR American in Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Yet, the Bush administration actually suggested Syria mediate the dispute. This would be akin to having China mediate our dispute with North Korea. Oh, I forgot. The Bush administration suggested that, too


Incredible unbelievable but sadly true.
9 posted on 08/13/2006 9:29:49 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson