Let me know if someone already posted this.
1 posted on
08/03/2006 2:06:55 PM PDT by
Havok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Havok
"Under your leadership...we have a full-fledged insurgency and full-blown sectarian conflict in Iraq." Hillary, under your reputed husband's "leadership," al-Qaeda was able to attack US interests with impunity, and without fear of reprisal, leading up to the horrific acts of 9/11.
2 posted on
08/03/2006 2:08:41 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: Havok; Admin Moderator
3 posted on
08/03/2006 2:09:06 PM PDT by
jdm
To: Havok
Rumsfeld's popularity has suffered through the three-year Iraqi insurgency, but Clinton has faced critics within her own party furious about her vote in 2002 to authorize the invasion of Iraq This explains her attack on Rumsfeld. She's working to pacify the base.
4 posted on
08/03/2006 2:09:30 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: Havok
![](http://webpages.charter.net/quantim/quantim/clintonplay.jpg)
The defense secretary seemed briefly stunned by the intensity of her attack,
5 posted on
08/03/2006 2:12:23 PM PDT by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: Havok
Pardon my French. All I can think of is "That B#TCH!"
Like she gives a damn.
Some Republican Senator on the panel should have laced into her.
That is, if they could find their testicles.
7 posted on
08/03/2006 2:13:10 PM PDT by
exit82
(If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
To: Havok
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton excoriated Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a Senate hearing Thursday![Image Hosted by ImageShack.us](http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/1853/dopesmokerxq3.jpg)
Walk it off Rummy, at least you don't have to live with the Beotch.
9 posted on
08/03/2006 2:13:41 PM PDT by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: Havok
To: Havok
"We have a full-fledged insurgency and full-blown sectarian conflict in Iraq." Her husband knows a little bit about things being full-blown. In fact, if her husband had been more concerned about taking care of the Nation's security than getting something onthe side, we might not be in the war we are now.
A_R
To: Havok
From the clips I heard, Rummy handed her fat-ass right back to her on a platter.
Wonder why THAT wasn't the headline?
15 posted on
08/03/2006 2:15:25 PM PDT by
digger48
To: Havok
Actually Hillary came a accross as a drone too stupid to know anything so had to just read her prepared statement from a sheet of paper. If anyone did any ripping it was Rummy.
16 posted on
08/03/2006 2:16:19 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: Havok
She is out there trying to score cheap political points. In any conflict there will be problems and mistakes and this administration has made its share. That's why hindsight is always 20/20 and we have historians to teach us what went wrong so we learn from it. Biatch is trying to cover her (substantial) flank here by criticizing the administration for things she and her rapist hubby have no clue about.
To: Havok
It would be nice if Rummy would hit back. F'rinstance reminding her that it was
her co-administration that:
- Turned down Osama Bin Laden when offered to us by Sudan.
- Quietly walked away when Sadaam kicked out all the UN inspectors.
- Lobbed a few long-range missiles when Bill needed to get Monica off the front page.
- Did absolutely nothing (except embolden the terrorists) when our embassies in East Africa were bombed and the USS Cole was attacked.
- Turned a humanitarian mission in Somalia into a half-baked military action, then cut and run at the first sign of trouble-- the very incident which Bin Laden said emboldened Al Qaida.
- I'm sure we could make a lot longer list . . .
Yeah, I know the MSM would be all over Rumsfeld for attaching a lady. But Hillary is no lady.
To: Havok
Listened to Rush on the way home from work.
Sounded like Donny Rumsfeld made Hillary Hildabeast look like what she is ....... an opportunist !!
26 posted on
08/03/2006 2:18:50 PM PDT by
IrishMike
(Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
To: Havok
"Sen. Clinton rips Rumsfeld over Iraq"
Hitley's pandering to Moveon/DU/Kos?
Inquiring minds want to know.
27 posted on
08/03/2006 2:20:49 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: Havok
Traslation of Hillary Clinton's remarks: "Hey Al Qaeda! You're winning! You're so effective we Democrats are going to rip the nation apart for cheap political gain, so keep the body bags coming! You've beat the USA and instead of pulling together as a nation during a time of national danger and realizing war has its ebbs and flows, we're just going to keep emboldening you with our divisiveness and message of 'we failed' in the war on terror!"
28 posted on
08/03/2006 2:21:24 PM PDT by
MikeA
(Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
To: Havok
Hillary's still angry that she didn't get asked to her Senior Prom. That was the beginning of her long road to becoming a lesbian.
30 posted on
08/03/2006 2:22:51 PM PDT by
GianniV
To: Havok
I missed the beginning of her crap but Rummy's reply was as if he were correcting a student whining about homework
To: Havok
The defense secretary seemed briefly stunned by the intensity of her attack, exclaiming, "My goodness," before launching into a point-by-point defense.I doubt that the Rumster was stunned. I think he was counting to 10. In addition, what usually follows "my goodness" is either "someone needs a time out" or "someone needs a hug."
41 posted on
08/03/2006 2:32:52 PM PDT by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
(Crush Islamofacists; see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women.)
To: Havok
Thx for the post. God she makes me sick.
1. Take a stronger anti war position without flip flopping like Kerry. That regains some favor lost from the far left.
2. Use this to gain momentum for her 2008 election bid and for her party to attack the administration.
What did she really say that we have not heard? More quagmire BS in a new package. Congressional hearing are 'dog and pony' shows anymore. Who cares what they say. They speak for 10 minutes and lecture us and at the end give a 5 second question. The hearings have turned into nothing more than another 'soapbox' for some to stand on. Sad-
44 posted on
08/03/2006 2:36:57 PM PDT by
Red6
To: Havok
Rumsfeld ripped right back. Which is what the headline should be.
45 posted on
08/03/2006 2:38:23 PM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(Fidel - NO MAS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson