Posted on 08/03/2006 8:39:52 AM PDT by presidio9
Do the sex preditor "residency" laws affect tourists? It so, then this sex based tourism would be in trouble.
(fort lauderdale eliminated the spring breakers for these deviants?)
LOL@ the watermelon( was that picture really necessary?)
look at the source of the article, the Sun Sentinal is essentially a pro-homo rag without the creative writing skills competence the NYT.
I thought it kinda fit with the theme (although I don't know if Gallagher's gay or not, but he sure looks it in the photo)
not queer, they are homosexuals. period.
They wish to use any word which disguises the fact that their entire lifestyle choice is focused on sexual activity with members of the same sex.
If you want another word, choose soddomite.
Good choice of words!!
Perhaps we need a truth is travel advertising law.
IOW if you are buying a package for a travel destination, you the consumer must be warned of all groups which may be having a group event at that destination.
Thus Disney which gives out discounts and special packages in june for homosexuals, would have to have the information publicly and centrally available for their customers. This would be applied to all groups thus if a homosexual does not want to go to Disney when there is a Baptist in the Park day they would be free to make the same informed decision.
Consumers have a right to know if they are being placed in the same environs as sexual hedonists.
"Why not have "Pedophile Days"?
I actually have asked that question as well as why not have sex addicts days, consenting incestuous days etc. and the answer I get all the time is: "because IT'S NOT LEGAL."
Yikes!!!!
If that is the math they are using, then they would also realize that 'breeders' have about $5.8 trillion in after-tax income. And if the results of the homo-marriage votes mean anything, then we can assume at least 80% of the country really, really doesn't like this whole pro-homo agenda push. This would mean they are risking at least $4.6 trillion to appease the homos.
Since it has come out that Disney is a mess in June (if you are unfamiliar with what happens during June, then you are lucky), Disney has seen a decline in attendence of straights during those months.. which dramatically impacts the bottomline. But since the vast majority of Disney's upper management is homo, they will never change those policies.
Doesn't anyone else think its a bit sick when the homos obsess about child oriented theme parks?
Wonder if the tax generation of gay tourists offsets the long term health care costs of the spreading of infectous diseases in florida?
How is this policy administered? Do you have to "qualify" in some way? Who decides if you are "homo" enough to "qualify" for the discount?
(Just all about money, huh?
Why not have "Pedophile Days"?
How about "Rapist-Days"?)
Sorry, but there's just not enough of them. If there were, I wouldn't be surprised if they did.
Sorry, but there's just not enough of them. If there were, I wouldn't be surprised if they did."
Does that mean their days are numbered?
Here in Forida we take money from french canadians, we might as well take fags money too. Not too sure which group is worse.
Yes, but in fairness, the average life expectancy of a gay male in this country is 42 years, due to high rates of AIDs & various other STDs, suicides, and substance abuse. This might be why "nobody chooses to be gay," but if that is the case, and we actually find the non-existent "gay gene" do you suppose they will favor aborting gay fetuses? I guess not.
I'm guessing that Disney does have some sort of "Christian Day," but I don't know that to be the case. Remember: Tacitly Disney does not recognize Fag Day, but they don't go out of their way to prevent it.
See post 57.
I suppose double standards are better than none! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.