Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BaBaStooey
I think that it is rare to have a Surgeon General which we here all like.

I consider this guy a success just from the standpoint that I had absolutely no clue who he was until today. He had very little mainstream breakthrough, therefore, a small influence on our nation via pop culture.

Much smaller than C. Everett Poopyhead and Jocelyn "Clapner" Edwards whom are the only two I can name off the top of my head and are therefore, the two worst in history.

The following are emails I have received from this Surgeon General you think so much of......??

"I think he was in a tough time," Benjamin said. "Here you have a guy who had significant experiences in preparedness and trauma and emergency care, and I wish we had used him more effectively in that role."

So, he could have prevented the thousands of people who died in hurricanes last year but chose not to????

Seriously, if that's his area of expertise, it was HIS job to use himself "more effectively in that role",
not wait for someone else to suggest it.

Yet another black mark on his record which someone will consider an "accomplishment".

Below is the Washington Post news report that US Surgeon General Carmona's term has expired and he has not been offered a renewed appointment for this "prestigious" post. It appears, after a lackluster performance for four years, which he hi-lighted recently by publicly misrepresenting his Smoking Report, containing the disorganized compilation of Tobacco Control doubtful scientific studies on the health effects from SHS for the last 20 years.

Following upon wide-spread disasters in this country, and particularly after wide-spread hurricanes and flooding in Florida and New Orleans, perhaps Dr. Carmona should have cited other constructive accomplishments to justify his official term:

"He cited several accomplishments in the letter, including educating Americans about the importance of preparing for natural and manmade disasters. He also noted his focus on trying to eliminate health disparities among parts of the population on such diseases as AIDS or diabetes."

I am curious what constructive purpose our appointed Surgeon General position is even supposed to represent in the USA now, and why HHS felt it appropriate to initially appointed a biased and publicly avowed proponent of tobacco prohibition? Sure sounds like placing the fox right in the hen house and then authorizing any destructive results as legal activities...while taxpayers still pay the bills.

Nice. Too late for my liking!
May he rot in Hell!




197 posted on 08/02/2006 5:33:55 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: SheLion

I don't think anything of him. I couldn't tell you the guy's name before I read the article about his leaving office.

I don't recall a single TV interview, any "Clapner" Elders-type scandal, any goofy Koop talking condoms cartoons for the kids....

Maybe he didn't have to go mainstream. Maybe he had some evil subversive underground control on our nation or something, but in my opinion he did what all Surgeon Generals should do. He was not seen and he was not heard.

With that said, I'm not a smoker, but smokers are fighting a battle against more than one man. This dude is just one cog in the huge anti-smoker wheel.


203 posted on 08/02/2006 5:53:37 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson