Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Adminstration Pursuing Globalist Agenda
Human Events ^ | July 31 2006 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 07/31/2006 3:05:40 PM PDT by Reagan Man

The hottest issue at the grass roots is illegal immigration and what our government is not doing to stop it. The question most frequently heard is, "Why doesn't the Bush administration get it?"

Maybe the Bush administration doesn't want to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants and plans to solve the problem by just declaring them all legal through amnesty and guest-worker proposals. Maybe the Bush administration is pursuing a globalist agenda. Consider this chronology.

On March 23, 2005, President Bush met at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with Vicente Fox of Mexico and Paul Martin of Canada in what they called a summit. The three heads of state then drove to Baylor University in Waco, Texas, where they issued a press release announcing their signing of an agreement to form the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

On May 17, 2005, the Council on Foreign Relations issued a 59-page document outlining a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter" to achieve "the freer flow of people within North America."

This document is full of language spelling out an "integrated" strategy to achieve an "open border for the movement of goods and people" within which "trade, capital, and people flow freely." The document calls for "a seamless North American market," allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access," "totalization" (the code word for putting illegal immigrants into the U.S. Social Security system), massive U.S. foreign aid, and even "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution."

Tying this document into the Bush-Fox-Martin March 23 Summit, the Council of Foreign Relations stated that the three men on that day "committed their governments" to the North American community goal, and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

On June 9, 2005, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar, R-Ind., held a friendly committee hearing that featured task force member Robert Pastor, a professor at American University and author of the 2001 book "Toward a North American Community" (Institute for International Economics, $28). He revealed further details of the plan for a "continental perimeter," including "an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors."

Pastor asserted that President Bush endorsed North American integration in the Guanajuato Proposal of February 16, 2001, in which Bush and Fox promised that "we will strive to consolidate a North American economic community." Bush followed up on April 22, 2001, by signing the Declaration of Quebec City in which he made a "commitment to hemispheric integration."

On June 27, 2005, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff attended a North American Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in Ottawa at which he said, "We want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a press release endorsing the Ottawa report and calling the meeting "an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

In July 2005, the White House let it be known that it is backing a coalition called Americans for Border and Economic Security organized by former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie. Its purpose is to conduct a political-style campaign to sell the American people on a guest-worker program wrapped in a few border-security promises and financed by coalition members who each put up $50,000 to $250,000.

On March 31 President Bush met at Cancun, Mexico, for a spring frolic with Fox and the new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Their press release celebrated what they called the first anniversary of the partnership, and Bush demanded that Congress pass an immigration bill with a worker permit program.

On May 15 Bush made a nationally televised speech in which he enunciated the amazing non sequitur that we can't have border security unless we also have a "comprehensive" bill including legalization of illegal immigrants now in the United States and the admission of new so-called guest workers.

Thanks to the investigative work of Jerome R. Corsi, we have learned that the partnership's more than 20 working groups are already quietly operating in the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the U.S. Department of Commerce, which refuses to reveal the groups' members because, in the words of partnership spokeswoman Geri Word, the Bush administration does not want them "distracted by calls from the public."

Corsi discovered recently that the partnership issued a "Report to Leaders" on June 27, 2005, that shows the partnership's extensive interaction with government and business groups in the three countries.

On June 15, 2006, the partnership's North American Competitiveness Council, consisting of government officials and corporate chief executive officers from the three countries, met to "institutionalize the partnership and the North American Competitiveness Council, so that the work will continue through changes in administrations."

The Bush administration is using a series of press releases, without authority from Congress or the American people, to shift us into the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership with "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; battyarticle; borders; cuespookymusic; geopolitics; globalism; globalistsundermybed; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; morethorzineplease; nau; northamericanunion; schlafly; spp; term2; theboogeyman; tinfoilalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-184 next last
To: Tokra
>>>>Globalization is going to happen whether we like it or not....

I could say, spoken like a true one-world global knothead, but I won't. You're probably right. To the detriment of America's future.

121 posted on 08/01/2006 12:23:50 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
And I'm done playing 20 questions with you.

And you've managed to post zero facts. Bravo!!

If you need more feedback, pick up a book and get informed.

You first!!

As you can see by this chart, we manufacture less and less every year. Only $3 trillion in industrial production this year. More than the GDP of every other nation except for Japan. Yes, we are surely doomed.

122 posted on 08/01/2006 12:24:19 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I could say, spoken like a true one-world global knothead, but I won't.

But you did, Blanche, but you did.

I think the world should be full of peace and love for mankind, but its not.
What we wish and what we face are two different things.

There is good and bad to everything. Yes, globalization has cost the US some jobs - but at the same time it has created other jobs when it opened global markets to us. We've gotten just as many positives out of it as we have negatives.

Just like the demise of the iceman and the blacksmith. All THEY could see was the end of THEIR world. The refrigerator repairman and the auto mechanic saw a whole new world open up for them. It all depends on where you are looking from.

123 posted on 08/01/2006 12:30:35 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
And the Iceman and blacksmith jobs just disappeared.

But my Dad was an iceman. He dropped out of school in 7th grade and bought a house a year later.

Got married, had 6 kids and bought a new (American, dammit) car every year. While Mom stayed home. All on an iceman's salary.

Now nobody can afford homes, cars or kids. I blame Bush. And those NAFTA refrigerators (with built in ice-maker, dammit) coming into the country on that NAFTA highway. Where is Jerome Corsi when we need him?

124 posted on 08/01/2006 12:36:56 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: pissant

"Did Bush suspend the abortion $ that was going to in foreign aid, reversing a clintoon exec order?
Did Bush unilaterally withdraw from the ABM?
Did Bush reject the Kyoto protocol against world condemnations?
Did Bush give the harshest speech to the UN it ever received in the lead up to the Iraq war?
Did Bush appoint John Bolton over the UN's and the Dems vociferous objections?
Did Bush unilaterally reject the International Criminal Court?
Is Bush the only world leader giving Israel cover to wipe out Hezbollah?
Did Bush give in and stop the NSA surveillance program because europe complained?
Did Bush conquer Iraq despite the UN telling him not to invade?
Did Bush allow bombings of a terrorist pow-wow accross the Pakistani border without UN approval?
Did he allow a hellfire missile to take out some terror scum in Yemen w/o UN approval of an attack on yemeni soil?
Did Bush put up steel tarrifs for a year despite the gnashing of teeth from the GATT and our allies?
Did Bush play hardball with the Canadians on soft lumber for the last 5 years? Did Bush play hardball with the canadians on salmon fishing harvests in 2001/2002?
Is Bush pushing for nuclear power plants, more coal plants and drilling in ANWR despite the howls of the global warming cretins and envirowackos?
Do our troops operate anywhere in the world under the UN banner or did Bush sign an executive order prohibiting it?
Is Bush heeding the UN and other world critics about the need to ban the death penalty?
Did Bush close down Guantanamo or any other prison despite the international condemnation?
Did Bush send Rummy to NATO to get along with the status quo or to pull it out of its stupor?
Did Bush sit down for one on one talks with NoKo because Kofi Annan and the globalists said he must?
Is Bush offering Japan and Israel and Australia and Britain our missile defense systems because Russia and China approve?
Did Bush and Cheney call Putin on the carpet because it would smooth international relations?
Who, besides Bush and the Pope, call on China to open up to political and religious freedom?
Who was the only president to EXPLICITLY say we will defend Taiwan against a chinese aggression?
Which world leader told the UN to pound sand and caused it's gun grabbing conference on small arms control to flop?
Who said that we will treat any regime that sponsors terrorists the same as the terrorists themselves?
Who is the only world leader pushing hard to isloate Iran over the nuclear program?
Did Bush allow the execution of Mexican criminals over the screeching objections of the Mexican gov't?
Who is pushing for massive UN reform?
Who has been insisting on a constitutional amendment against gay marriage.
Who spearheaded the arms shipment interception policy with a handful of other countries that did not ask the UN for approval, and which led to busting Kaddafi?
Which country is putting the kabash on UN talks regarding international taxation?
Who is having troops operate in the horn of Africa w/o UN approval?
Which leader has called the islamo fascists islamo fascists?
Is Bush content with the status quo in the ME or is he ramroding changes down their throats?
Has Bush lifted the sanctions on Cuba due to international pressure, or did he up the fines to Americans that travel there?
Did Bush cave into the euroweenies who complained about the size of the corporate tax cuts he signed into law? "


The only downside to posting such an impressive list like that is that it's even more obvious that SECURING OUR BORDERS is something Bush CHOOSES NOT TO DO and in a post 9/11 world, he does so at risk to national security. Clearly he has an open borders, keep the cheap labor coming, agenda.


125 posted on 08/01/2006 12:46:20 PM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Is that globalist or greedy though?


126 posted on 08/01/2006 12:52:06 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

"Economics 101."


The success of our economy is entirely dependent on one thing......

"Although they broke the law by illegally crossing our borders ... our city's economy would be a shell of itself had they not, and it would collapse if they were deported," he said. "The same holds true for the nation." Bloomberg

cheap, illegal labor.





127 posted on 08/01/2006 12:52:25 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: pissant

"Is that globalist or greedy though?"

When it comes to our national security and Bush's refusal to secure the border, does it matter? As far as I'm concerned, it's both and more, none good.


128 posted on 08/01/2006 12:58:07 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Well, its Bush (as all the presidents before him)givng into the hotel and agricultural industry. At least he's doing something now. The National guard helping on the border is way overdue.

As far as I am concerned, no addtional laws need to be passed. Just enforce the current ones and fund a fence. End of story.


129 posted on 08/01/2006 1:01:01 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
>>>>The success of our economy is entirely dependent on one thing...... cheap, illegal labor.

That's what the open borders/amnesty crowd of NWO one-worlders would have you believe. LOL These neocons and liberatarians need a long, long time out.

130 posted on 08/01/2006 1:04:09 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

ROFL!


131 posted on 08/01/2006 3:07:14 PM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Globalist my ass.

Damn pissant...great rant.

132 posted on 08/01/2006 8:05:00 PM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Ssshhh! You're not supposed to bother them with facts!

They want to believe that the US doesn't manufacture anything anymore, that the middle class is being forced into abject poverty.

The fact is that Americans are richer than ever. Even the poorest Americans are richer than ever, richer than 95% of the rest of the world.


133 posted on 08/01/2006 8:43:01 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Bttt


134 posted on 08/01/2006 8:45:12 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: evad

Tanks. ;o)


135 posted on 08/01/2006 8:54:16 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

I refute the entire damn thing and its underlying premise. I'm not going to "fisk" it.


136 posted on 08/01/2006 9:00:30 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler

You can always count on Dr. Seuss for sublime wisdom. ;o)


137 posted on 08/01/2006 9:01:43 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

I agree with that. That the socialists, of which there are many, in the CFR are worthless. And I will tell you Bush & Cheney have next to nothing to do with them.


138 posted on 08/01/2006 9:02:58 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Good Lord, that's a mouthful.


139 posted on 08/01/2006 9:03:30 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

:o)


140 posted on 08/01/2006 9:03:56 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson