Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frightening internal polling (House GOP to lose 30 seats?)
RedState ^ | Jul 30th, 2006 | HoosierTeacher

Posted on 07/30/2006 2:06:41 PM PDT by rface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-382 next last
To: RFEngineer

Conservatives get "hosed" far worse if the crew depicted above takes the reins. I agree that the Repub party needs to move to the right, but let's not forget the differences between the parties.


121 posted on 07/30/2006 3:16:46 PM PDT by BushMeister ("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
I just wondered how closely fundraising seems to tie into actual voting.

Good question. I have no idea of precise numbers/ratios.

122 posted on 07/30/2006 3:17:19 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

If you don't vote for the GOP, you're giving this country over to the liberals.

And they will NEVER let go of that power once they get it back.

The first thing Hillary and some of her pals want to do is dismantle the Electoral College.

If you can live with that, go right ahead.


123 posted on 07/30/2006 3:17:52 PM PDT by Howlin (Pres.Bush ought to be ashamed of himself for allowing foreign countries right on our borders!!~~Zook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: rface
I suspect it's true. Why?

Let's see...Iraq, deficit, trade, immigration, social security, H1-B's, increasing interest rates, and increasing energy prices. All contribute to the perceptions of the incumbent party.

Please do not shoot the messenger. I merely state that I regard the above as the reasons for the polls. Yes, I realize that many of them are beyond the control of the Congress or the President. No, it isn't all Bush's fault. No, I don't want Hillary in. Standard disclaimers apply. Void where prohibited. Don't read before driving.

124 posted on 07/30/2006 3:18:28 PM PDT by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I've had great fun with you kiddies, but I'm all worn out from mixing emotional hysteria with opposing facts and figures.

And there's a thunderstorm coming, so I'd better get my young'uns into the bunker!

125 posted on 07/30/2006 3:18:39 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Given that Novak admits to being a registered RAT I am always wary of what he reports. Some reporters may still report objectively but mostly I suspect ulterior motives to be lurking especially when it comes to President Bush and Republicans.


126 posted on 07/30/2006 3:19:09 PM PDT by mountainfolk (God bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: TEX06

Apart from being unfunny, why vote for Kinky Friedman?


127 posted on 07/30/2006 3:20:03 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Brilliant thinking there hotdog...

You draw conclusions with virtually no information.

The only "spoiled little brat" behavior demonstrated was your reply.

There's a thing called denial. You've got a serious case of it. Grow up.

And last but not least, about the only "Republican" candidate for President I cannot vote for is McCain. He's nuts. And I can't be in part responsible for him ever getting into the White House. So virtually anyone else, if required, I'll hold my noise and vote for them if that's what it takes to keep the Dems out.
128 posted on 07/30/2006 3:23:54 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: rface

It is my understanding that in 1994 there were a number of open seats in play. I believe it was something like 50. This was due to the fact the election law was changed and incumbents could not any more take campaign money they had accumulated while in office with them after that date for personnel use after leaving office. The majority of those retiring were in the South and were Democrats. Political make up of the area had changed so when the Democratic incumbents were not running the GOP candidates won. That is the the reason the GOP picked up so many seats during that election. My exact facts may not be correct but the general idea is. May be somebody out there knows more about this than I do.


129 posted on 07/30/2006 3:24:42 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Most campaigns have not even done internal polling yet because it is a waste of time in the summer. Rush and others forget that Congressional seats are local elections and you cannot take nationwide numbers for them because the people on the coasts are not going to vote the same as flyover country.

Oklahoma will maintain its same 4-1 split. Might as well be 5-0 because Boren votes more with the GOP then the Dems. We just had our primary and it was rumored that Sullivan from Tulsa might go down but he clobbered the people that ran against him.

I think this is a bunch of Bravo Sierra and I cannot remember the last time Rush got polling right. IMO he has lost his edge completely. People also have to remember that not every Republican is a conservative which seems lost by so many on here. You cannot elect a conservative in some areas but the naysayers on here cannot seem to get it through their minds. Would bet they don't come from the Conservative Republican south and flyover country.


130 posted on 07/30/2006 3:24:52 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Elect George Allen for President 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Babu; All

Since Coulter and Rush are talking about it at the same time...it makes one wonder if the Republican leadership want this information out there early so Conservative will think twice about sitting this election out. I mean, look who the messengers were.....Anyone agree with me on this one?


131 posted on 07/30/2006 3:25:54 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coop

So the best you can do is hit and run personal attacks eh?


132 posted on 07/30/2006 3:28:14 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: rface

Trying to get the base out to vote?


133 posted on 07/30/2006 3:29:07 PM PDT by skr (We cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not innocent.-- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
I guess it has nothing to do with the RNC abandoning Joe Sixpack. There is a complete disconnect between the elite GOPers and the base. And no amount of screaming from the base makes any impression.

Yep thwy are as out of touch with their base as Bush was in naming Harriet Myers as A Supreme candidate
134 posted on 07/30/2006 3:29:59 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Not even a possibility -- Neither Coulter nor Limbaugh are lackeys/messengers for the RNC.


135 posted on 07/30/2006 3:30:21 PM PDT by Babu ('guv-mint' - doesn't taste good, and isn't good for you either, except in very LIMITED quanitities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Babu

You're joking right? You don't think that if asked by party leadership to do this, they would?


136 posted on 07/30/2006 3:31:15 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Hopefully you are absolutely correct.


137 posted on 07/30/2006 3:31:37 PM PDT by Sender (“Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Coop; BushMeister

You're both wrong. If we lose 16 or more, we lose the House.


138 posted on 07/30/2006 3:32:07 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Blagden Alley
Much of this strikes me as a large load of horse whatever

Pucky?

139 posted on 07/30/2006 3:32:17 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
They likely do want that message out. Get the base motivated in at least fear... Too bad they can't actually do something themselves that the base would be motivated to support... Point that little detail out and you're called a RINO or worse... If you don't share the same delusion of "everything is fine" then be off with you... Brilliant thinking by too many here (not speaking of you Hildy).
140 posted on 07/30/2006 3:33:37 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson